A new gene Bph33(t) conferring resistance to brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) in rice line RP2068-18-3-5

Naik, S. Bhaskar; Divya, Dhanasekar; Sahu, Nihar; Sundaram, R. M.; Sarao, Preetinder Singh; Singh, Kuldeep; Lakshmi, V. Jhansi; Bentur, J. S.

doi:10.1007/s10681-018-2131-5

Cited by 30 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although several strategies are available to manage BPH infestation, building BPH resistance in rice plants by identifying and introgressing BPH resistance genes is the most convenient and efficient strategy. To date, 37 BPH resistance genes have been identified from cultivated and wild species of Oryza : BPH1 , BPH2 , BPH3 , BPH4, BPH5, BPH6, BPH7, BPH8, BPH9, BPH10, BPH11 (t) , BPH12 (t) ,BPH12, BPH13 (t), BPH14 , BPH15 , BPH16 (t), BPH17, BPH18, BPH19 (t) , BPH20, BPH21, BPH22 (t) , BPH23 (t) ,BPH24 (t) , BPH25 (t) , BPH26 (t), BPH27 , BPH28, BHP29,BPH30, BPH31, BPH32,BPH33 , BPH3 and BPH35, BPH36 and BPH37 (Khush et al 1985; Kabis and Khush 1988; Nemoto et al 1989; Ishii et al 1994; Murata et al 1998; Hirabayashi et al 1998; Renganayaki et al 2002; Yanget al 2002; Sharma et al 2003; Yang et al 2004; Hirabayashi et al 2004; Sun et al 2005; Chang-Chao et al 2006; Chen et al 2006; Jena et al 2006; Sai Harini et al 2010; Jairin et al 2007, 2010; Li et al 2019; Ram et al 2008; Rahman et al 2009; Du et al 2009; Qiu et al 2010; Deen et al 2010; Qiu et al 2012; Myint et al 2012; Huang et al 2013; Wu et al 2014; Wang et al 2015; Wang et al 2018; Ren et al 2016; Prahalada et al 2017; Kumar et al 2018; Naik et al 2018; Yang et al 2019; Yuexiong et al 2019). Among these, only eight genes ( BPH14, BPH17, BPH18, BPH26, BPH29, BPH9, BPH32, BPH31 and BPH6 ) were cloned and characterized (Du et al 2009; Tamura et al 2014; Liu et al 2015; Wang et al 2015; Ji et al 2016; Ren et al 2016; Zhao et al 2016; Guo et al 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although significant achievements have been made in host-plant resistance to resist the attack of BPH by identifying and introgressing BPH resistance genes, the quick evolution of virulent BPH populations poses a primary concern (Naik et al 2018). Hence, there is a need to explore more genetic variants from the diverse novel genes for building resistance to defend against the new virulent BPH populations to ultimately, attain durable and broad-spectrum resistance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identification of a novel locus, BPH38(t), conferring resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) using early backcross population in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rice is the most important staple food crop, and it feeds more than half of the world population. Brown planthopper (BPH) is a major insect pest of rice that causes 20–80% yield loss through direct and indirect damage. The identification and use of BPH resistance genes can efficiently manage BPH. A molecular marker-based genetic analysis of BPH resistance was carried out using 101 BC1F5 mapping population derived from a cross between a BPH-resistant indica variety Khazar and an elite BPH-susceptible line Huang–Huan–Zhan. The genetic analysis indicated the existence of Mendelian segregation for BPH resistance. A total of 702 high-quality polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, genotypic data, and precisely estimated BPH scores were used for molecular mapping, which resulted in the identification of the BPH38(t) locus on the long arm of chromosome 1 between SNP markers 693,369 and id 10,112,165 of 496.2 kb in size with LOD of 20.53 and phenotypic variation explained of 35.91%. A total of 71 candidate genes were predicted in the detected locus. Among these candidate genes, LOC_Os01g37260 was found to belong to the FBXL class of F-box protein possessing the LRR domain, which is reported to be involved in biotic stress resistance. Furthermore, background analysis and phenotypic selection resulted in the identification of introgression lines (ILs) possessing at least 90% recurrent parent genome recovery and showing superior performance for several agro-morphological traits. The BPH resistance locus and ILs identified in the present study will be useful in marker-assisted BPH resistance breeding programs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10681-019-2506-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of a novel locus, BPH38(t), conferring resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) using early backcross population in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Host‐plant resistance in rice is considered to be the most practical and economical approach for controlling rice planthoppers . In addition to the previously documented 84 major genes/quantitative trait loci for planthopper resistance in rice, at least 13 new major genes/quantitative trait loci for planthopper resistance in rice have been reported over the last 2 years, including Bph30 (AC‐1613), Bph31 , Bph32 (Rathu Heenati), Bph33 , Bph33 ( t ), Bph34 , qSBPH5 , qSBPH7 , qSBPH10 , qWBPH3.1 , qWBPH3.2 , qWBPH11 and qWBPH12 . Moreover, three unnamed recessive genes for BPH resistance have been reported from two newly identified rice germplasm sources (PHS29 and MRST3) .…”

Section: Molecular Players Of Rice Originmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current understanding of the molecular players involved in resistance to rice planthoppers

Yang

Zhang

2019

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rice planthoppers are the most widespread and destructive pest of rice. Planthopper control depends greatly on the understanding of molecular players involved in resistance to planthoppers. This paper summarizes the recent progress in the understanding of some molecular players involved in resistance to planthoppers and the mechanisms involved. Recent researches showed that host‐plant resistance is the most promising sustainable approach for controlling planthoppers. Planthopper‐resistant varieties with a host‐plant resistance gene have been released for rice products. Integrated planthopper management is a proposed strategy to prolong the durability of host‐plant resistance. Bacillus spp. and their gene products or insect pathogenic fungi have great potential for application in the biological control of planthoppers. Enhancement of the activity of the natural enemies of planthoppers would be more cost‐effective and environmentally friendly. Various molecular processes regulate rice–planthopper interactions. Rice encounters planthopper attacks via transcription factors, secondary metabolites, and signaling networks in which phytohormones have central roles. Maintenance of cell wall integrity and lignification act as physical barriers. Indirect defenses of rice are regulated via chemical elicitors, honeydew‐associated elicitor, amendment with silicon and biochar, and salivary protein of BPH as elicitor or effector. Further research directions on planthopper control and rice defense against planthoppers are also put forward. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

“…Traditionally, farmers solely depended on chemical pesticides for controlling BPH [7,8]. However, the overuse of pesticides has resulted in a series of negative effects such as resistance of pests to synthetic chemicals, pests resurgence, and environmental contamination [9][10][11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antibiosis Effects of Rice Carrying Bph14 and Bph15 on the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens

Qiu

Wang²,

Shi³

et al. 2020

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The brown planthopper(BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, is the most destructive insect pest in rice production worldwide. The development and cultivation of BPH-resistant varieties is the most economical and efficient strategy to overcome the destruction caused by BPH. The modified bulk seedling test method was used to identify the BPH resistance level and host feeding choice of rice lines of Liangyou8676(Bph14/Bph15), Bph68S(Bph14/Bph15), RHT(Bph3), Fuhui676, and TN1 on BPH. In the meantime, the population, survival and emergence rate, developmental duration, honeydew excretion, female ratio and brachypterous ratio of adults were used as indicators to detect the antibiosis effects of the different rice lines. The results showed that the resistance levels of RHT, Bph68S, Liangyou8676, Fuhui676, and TN1 to BPH were HR, R, MR, S and HS, respectively. The host choice implied that BPH was more inclined to feeding on rice plants with a lower resistance. An analysis of the antibiosis activity of rice lines RHT, BPh68S, and Liangyou8676 carrying resistance genes indicated a significant reduction in the population growth rate, survival and emergence rate of BPH nymphs, significant delay in the developmental duration of nymphs, reduced honeydew excretion of females, decreased female ratio, and a decreased brachypterous ratio of females and males, when compared with rice carrying no BPH-resistant genes.

show abstract

A new gene Bph33(t) conferring resistance to brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) in rice line RP2068-18-3-5

Cited by 30 publications

References 25 publications

Identification of a novel locus, BPH38(t), conferring resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) using early backcross population in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Identification of a novel locus, BPH38(t), conferring resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal.) using early backcross population in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Current understanding of the molecular players involved in resistance to rice planthoppers

Antibiosis Effects of Rice Carrying Bph14 and Bph15 on the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About