2018
DOI: 10.1080/00207160.2018.1463438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new hybrid GA−ACO−PSO algorithm for solving various engineering design problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance comparison has been done with three sate of art algorithms i.e. SVM classifier (without any optimization technique), Firefly (SVM with Firefly optimization [14]) [1], ACO-PSO-GA (SVM with hybrid ACO-PSO-GA optimization) [9] using sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracy as the parameters. The analysis parameters i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance comparison has been done with three sate of art algorithms i.e. SVM classifier (without any optimization technique), Firefly (SVM with Firefly optimization [14]) [1], ACO-PSO-GA (SVM with hybrid ACO-PSO-GA optimization) [9] using sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracy as the parameters. The analysis parameters i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, PSO has many advantages, such as stability, a short time convergence, few parameters to adjust and ease of implementation. PSO has been successfully applied to the combination optimization of various engineering problem areas, such as data mining [47], artificial neural network training [48], vehicle path planning [49], medical diagnosis [50,51] and system and engineering design [52].…”
Section: Pso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main motive of this hybrid algorithm is to remove the limitation of individual algorithms by combining the strengths of each algorithm. The exploration strength of ACO is combined with exploitation property of PSO which are being balanced by the GA [10]. The crossover phase of GA is replaced DE perturbation phase to improve the convergence of the overall algorithm to produce better results in less iteration.…”
Section: Hybrid Aco-pso-ga-de Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of HAPGD algorithm is compared with hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms i.e. ACO-PSO [12], ACO-GA [13], PSO-GA [14], GA-DE [15] and ACO-PSO-GA [10] using the parameters described above on 7 datasets given in table 1 has been done in this section. The results are evaluated by executing the algorithms 20 times and taking the average of results.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%