2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-018-0769-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new implementation of narrowband interference detection, characterization, and mitigation technique for a software-defined multi-GNSS receiver

Abstract: Due to the very low power of satellite signals when reaching the earth's surface, global navigation satellite system receivers are vulnerable to various types of radio frequency interference, and, therefore, countermeasures are necessary. In the case of a narrowband interference (NBI), the adaptive notch filtering technique has been extensively investigated. However, the research on the topic has focused on the adaptation of the notch frequency, but not of the notch width. We present a fully adaptive solution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of multi-constellation GNSS receivers provides more protection against RF interference than single-constellation receivers, such as a GPS only device. The more costly multi-constellation, multifrequency receivers, capable of receiving all of the signals listed in Table II.C.2, actually provide a high level of protection against RF interference, as the frequency diversity of the various GNSS signals makes it unlikely that a single interference or jamming source could block all satellite reception [61].…”
Section: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multi-constellation GNSS receivers provides more protection against RF interference than single-constellation receivers, such as a GPS only device. The more costly multi-constellation, multifrequency receivers, capable of receiving all of the signals listed in Table II.C.2, actually provide a high level of protection against RF interference, as the frequency diversity of the various GNSS signals makes it unlikely that a single interference or jamming source could block all satellite reception [61].…”
Section: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the GNSS navigation signal adopts a direct sequence spread spectrum, and its downlink signal reaches the receiver with a weak signal, about -130dbm [3], making the GNSS receiver vulnerable to intentional or unintentional radio frequency interference (RFI) in the electromagnetic environment. Unintentional sources of RFI mainly include harmonic emissions [4] of some electrical equipment in life, such as commercial high-power transmitter, television, and personal electronic equipment, etc. The jammer produces malicious jamming, and the jamming method is to disrupt the receiver operation by deliberately broadcasting strong signals in the GNSS frequency band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focusses on the threat posed by Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) to the GNSS L1/E1 spectrum. RFI can be emitted either unintentionally, e.g., by commercial high-power transmitters, ultra-wideband radar, television, VHF, mobile satellite services, and personal electronic devices, or intentionally, e.g., by jammers and more sophisticated signal spoofing devices [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, the above activities aim to improve mitigation and resilience of future GNSS receivers against real-world interference threats. An example of such an attempt has already been made in [3], where an adaptive interference mitigation technique was proposed to counteract unintentional Narrow-Band Interference (NBI) detected at one of the STRIKE3 monitoring sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%