2018
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new instrument for measuring pre‐service biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: The PCK‐IBI

Abstract: Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is highly important for effective design and implementation of school teaching. Thus, the current status, development and efficacy of this knowledge, its relationships with teaching quality parameters, and its impact on students' learning processes and success, require rigorous examination. Thoroughly validated, objective and reliable test instruments that are highly sensitive to changes in variables of proven knowledge-related relevance in teacher education are al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various theoretical works and large-scale empirical studies have highlighted the importance of teachers' professional knowledge for the quality of classroom teaching and student learning success [28]- [30]. One thing that makes the difference between teachers and subject experts is their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)-the combination of content and pedagogy to form a unique knowledge base for the teaching of a particular discipline [29], [31].…”
Section: Tpck Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various theoretical works and large-scale empirical studies have highlighted the importance of teachers' professional knowledge for the quality of classroom teaching and student learning success [28]- [30]. One thing that makes the difference between teachers and subject experts is their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)-the combination of content and pedagogy to form a unique knowledge base for the teaching of a particular discipline [29], [31].…”
Section: Tpck Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These attributes mirrored those of the anticipated respondent population, which we found to be imperative to our survey development efforts. Likewise, the collective procedures used to gather evidence for the face validity of our survey reflected those steps described in previous studies employing survey measures designed to examine instructor praxis and professional development (Allen and Yen, 2001;Schussler et al, 2015;Großschedl et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data is entered into the Excel program and analyzed using WINSTEP software on the Rasch model. The data collected was analyzed with the Rasch model because this analysis has advantages over classical theory, which is used in educational research (e.g., Großschedl et al, 2019;Park & Liu, 2019). After all, it can measure in detail the difficulty level of each item and the Person Ability on a logit scale (Stone & Wright, 1999;Sumintono & Widhiarso, 2015).…”
Section: Extended Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has investigated an instrument, the ecocritical thinking skill, analyzed using the Rasch model (Setiawan et al, 2018;Großschedl et al, 2019). The ecocritical thinking skill instrument analyzed has the suitability of the items following the expected model, based Notes every "#" = 2 people ".…”
Section: Figure 2 Differential Item Functioning Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%