2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new integration scheme for CO2 capture in low-rank coal fired power plants with energy savings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the power is replaced by the renewal energy, the increasing powers would be 115.03, 592.12, 743.06, and 959.33 MWh per day with Systems 1-4, respectively. This would result in the standard coal consumption decrement of Systems 1-4 by 35.07, 180.52, 226.54, and 292.47 t, equivalent to the CO 2 emission reduction by 100.65, 518.11, 650.18, and 839.42 t, respectively [39]. Considering the peak-shaving policy, assuming that the subsidized price is 68 USD/MWh, the peaking revenue of Systems 1-4 would reach 7822, 40,264, 50,528, and 65,235 USD per day, respectively.…”
Section: Thermodynamic and Operational Performance Under The Off-desi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the power is replaced by the renewal energy, the increasing powers would be 115.03, 592.12, 743.06, and 959.33 MWh per day with Systems 1-4, respectively. This would result in the standard coal consumption decrement of Systems 1-4 by 35.07, 180.52, 226.54, and 292.47 t, equivalent to the CO 2 emission reduction by 100.65, 518.11, 650.18, and 839.42 t, respectively [39]. Considering the peak-shaving policy, assuming that the subsidized price is 68 USD/MWh, the peaking revenue of Systems 1-4 would reach 7822, 40,264, 50,528, and 65,235 USD per day, respectively.…”
Section: Thermodynamic and Operational Performance Under The Off-desi...mentioning
confidence: 99%