2013
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1203-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new intelligent classifier for breast cancer diagnosis based on a rough set and extreme learning machine: RS + ELM

Abstract: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women all around the world. Therefore, true and early diagnosis of breast cancer is an important problem. The rough set (RS) and extreme learning machine (ELM) methods were used collectively in this study for the diagnosis of breast cancer. The unnecessary attributes were discarded from the dataset by means of the RS approach. The classification process by means of ELM was performed using the remaining attributes. The Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset (WB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…output, the mathematical model with M hidden neurons can be defined as in Kaya (2013): In a network of the N training samples, the aim is with zero error:…”
Section: Extreme Learning Machine (Elm) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…output, the mathematical model with M hidden neurons can be defined as in Kaya (2013): In a network of the N training samples, the aim is with zero error:…”
Section: Extreme Learning Machine (Elm) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ELM, the weightings belonging to neurons at the input layer, and the bias values belonging to neurons in the hidden and input layers, are all randomly generated. By contrast, the outputs from the hidden layer are computed analytically (Huang et al, 2006;Kaya, 2013). The most significant feature of the ELM model is that the learning process is very efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best reported accuracy was 99.74% with 10-fold cross validation [15]. ANN was implemented in other studies [18][19][20][21][22]. The best accuracy was 100%, with 80% of the data used for learning and the remaining 20% for testing [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maglogiannis et al [12] presented using support vector machine (SVM) for diagnosing the breast cancer both on Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer and the Wisconsin Prognostic Breast Cancer datasets. Kaya et al [13] proposed a novel approach based on rough set and extreme learning machine for distinguishing the benign or malignant breast cancer. Akay et al [14] proposed a novel SVM combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%