2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01120.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Interpretation of the Distance Puzzle Based on Geographic Neutrality

Abstract: One of the most remarkable features of globalization is the fact that advances in technol-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These costs vary with the distances to different countries. The results in Arribas and Pérez (2011) indicate that the importance of distance has been increasing until the mid-1990s but has since returned to the levels of 30 years ago. Therefore, the role of distance they claim, on average, still exists.…”
Section: Outward Fdi Substitutes Exportsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These costs vary with the distances to different countries. The results in Arribas and Pérez (2011) indicate that the importance of distance has been increasing until the mid-1990s but has since returned to the levels of 30 years ago. Therefore, the role of distance they claim, on average, still exists.…”
Section: Outward Fdi Substitutes Exportsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…N.A. Arribas and Pérez (2011) United States and 58 countries Buckley and Pearce (1979) Firm level. N.A.…”
Section: Outward Fdi Substitutes Exportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, several studies show that the magnitude of the distance effect on trade is influenced by different factors such as, national economic and financial development levels (Becker & Greenberg, ; Huang, ), landlockness (Behar & Venables, ; Clark, Dollar, & Micco, ; Limão & Venables, 2001;), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use (Freund & Weinhold, ; Choi, ), and national socio‐economic factors (Huang, ). Arribas, Perez, and Tortosa‐Ausina () show that the importance of the geographic distance for international trade varies significantly across countries. They find significant international variations in the discrepancies between distance‐corrected and distance‐uncorrected trade‐integration indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, it is important to bear in mind the explanation of the distance puzzle given inArribas et al (2011) from the construction of international trade integration indicators; the authors find that the role of distance in bilateral trade, on average, still matters despite the reductions in the cost of trade, although it varies across countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%