“…Several authors have identified the need for a complex theory of IPV that takes into account the varied dimensions of human identity and social status, including race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and disability on women's experiences of IPV (Gilbert, 2002;Greene, 2000;Hanson & Maroney, 1999;Merrill, 1999;Ristock, 2002;Van Natta, 2005). Much of this discussion has highlighted the heterosexist and Eurocentric nature of the dominant gender-based discourses of IPV that currently guide the philosophy and worldviews of the majority of domestic violence service agencies currently operating in the United States (Elliot, 1999;Garcia, 1999;Ristock, 2002). Consistent with findings reported in other studies of FSSIPV, our findings revealed that the hegemony of gender-based analysis of IPV was a barrier to help seeking for many women in our study.…”