2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Language to Support Flexible Failure Recovery for Workflow Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent development of abductive constraint solvers such as A-system (Kakas, 2001), which is itself written in Sicstus Prolog, may point to ways of enhancing the ability of the Failure Manager to further localize the origins of constraint failure and to infer and rank suitable constraint revisions for the relevant originators, assisting their collaborative recovery. These aims share common ground with work on constrained workflow management, as in (Hwang, 2003) and (Wainer, 2003a) and (Wainer 2003b) who variously employ procedural constraints or standard logic programming integrity constraints but not CLP (FD). We also intend partly to reimplement our model in the multi-agent formalism Go!…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent development of abductive constraint solvers such as A-system (Kakas, 2001), which is itself written in Sicstus Prolog, may point to ways of enhancing the ability of the Failure Manager to further localize the origins of constraint failure and to infer and rank suitable constraint revisions for the relevant originators, assisting their collaborative recovery. These aims share common ground with work on constrained workflow management, as in (Hwang, 2003) and (Wainer, 2003a) and (Wainer 2003b) who variously employ procedural constraints or standard logic programming integrity constraints but not CLP (FD). We also intend partly to reimplement our model in the multi-agent formalism Go!…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A dynamic approach was presented by Hwang et al [11]. Here, a failure recovery language supports multiple exceptions per activity, and applies rollback using ECP (end compensation point).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%