2006
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1050.0261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Linear Programming Approach to Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Problems

Abstract: We consider the problem of radiation therapy treatment planning for cancer patients. During radiation therapy, beams of radiation pass through a patient, killing both cancerous and normal cells. Thus, the radiation therapy must be carefully planned so that a clinically prescribed dose is delivered to targets containing cancerous cells, while nearby organs and tissues are spared. Currently, a technique called intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered to be the most effective radiation therapy f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
126
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective function f takes the form of a weighted linear function. 9 It consists of four parts: (1) Max (min) dose of OARs (PTV); (2) mean dose of OARs and PTV; (3) dose volume constraints modeled as piecewise linear functions; 10,11 and (4) maximum dose constraints for OARs. For the weights associated with items (1)-(3), we choose initial values in the range of 1-10 and allow these weights to be manually adjusted during the optimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function f takes the form of a weighted linear function. 9 It consists of four parts: (1) Max (min) dose of OARs (PTV); (2) mean dose of OARs and PTV; (3) dose volume constraints modeled as piecewise linear functions; 10,11 and (4) maximum dose constraints for OARs. For the weights associated with items (1)-(3), we choose initial values in the range of 1-10 and allow these weights to be manually adjusted during the optimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that p / āˆˆ P , it was shown empirically in Bortfeld et al [2008] that w * remains feasible with high probability. Due to the linearity of this model and the use of polyhedral uncertainty sets, this model is capable of accomodating robust versions of many other types of clinically relevant constraints, such as partial volume constraints based on conditional-value-at-risk (see Romeijn et al [2006]) or constraints involving Ī±EUD (Thieke et al [2002]), which is a linear approximation to the popular equivalent uniform dose (EUD) metric. For simplicity, we consider only lower and upper dose bounds on the tumour.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values can be set to approximate dose volume histogram constraints (see Langer et al, 1990), or other piecewise linearizations can be used to implement so-called CVAR constraints (Romeijn et al, 2006), or standard infinity or L 1 norm constraints. Further details on these choices are available in Lim et al (2006).…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%