A new marking technique in semi-automated assessment

Buyrukoğlu, Selim; Batmaz, Firat; Lock, Russell

doi:10.1109/iccse.2017.8085551

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It works manually graded by teachers or lectures. The semiautomatic assessment tools as automatically check and also manually check the assessment [45]. It still needs manual inspection.…”

Section: Assessment Tools Typementioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment Tools in the Blended Learning Environment

Febriani¹,

Abdullah²

2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An effective method of student assessment technique is necessary for assessing student knowledge. Nowadays, the utilization of formative assessment tools in blended learning is increasing because it can enhance the learning quality. The main aim of this study to identify and classify existing research through the research approach, assessment tools type, and assessment specialty on formative assessment tools in a blended learning environment. This study guiding the educators in choosing and developing new assessment tools. The methodology of this research using a systematic review. This method using the inclusion and exclusion process to make a systematic review focused and choose appropriate studies. The result shows that the highest usage of assessment tool type is automatic assessment with the percentage of 87%. Semi-Automatic assessment has 13% and manual assessment 0%. It proves that technology is an important part of education and teaching because significantly transform the method of assessment from manual to automatic assessment type. This is a great transformation from the traditional method to the modern method of assessment. We recommend to further improve methods for online formative assessment and develop computer-based testing in a blended learning environment for future work.

show abstract

“…It works manually graded by teachers or lectures. The semiautomatic assessment tools as automatically check and also manually check the assessment [45]. It still needs manual inspection.…”

Section: Assessment Tools Typementioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment Tools in the Blended Learning Environment

Febriani¹,

Abdullah²

2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More detailed information on segmented marking is presented in section 3. A feasibility study was carried out on segmented marking, and the participants’ thoughts were captured using a questionnaire . More detailed information can be obtained from .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A feasibility study was carried out on segmented marking, and the participants’ thoughts were captured using a questionnaire . More detailed information can be obtained from . Normally, the marker sees the whole code script on the screen without scrolling down if code script is short.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving marking efficiency for longer programming solutions based on a semi‐automated assessment approach

Buyrukoğlu

Batmaz

Lock

2019

Comp Applic In Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, many students in higher education have begun to learn programming languages. In doing so they will complete a variety of programming tasks of varying degrees of complexity. The students need to get consistent and personalized feedback to develop their programming skills. Human markers can provide personalized feedback using traditional manual approaches to assessment, but they may provide inconsistent feedback (especially for long programming solutions) since marking the programming solutions of multiple students can represent a significant workload for them. While full‐automated assessment systems are the best to provide consistent feedback, they may not provide sufficiently personalized feedback for novice programmers. This study develops a novel semi‐automated assessment approach in order to improve efficiency of human marker in the marking process and increase consistency of feedback (for both short and long programming solutions). It advocates the reuse of human marker's comments for similar code snippets, defined as segmented marking in this study. New full and partial marking models are developed based on segmented marking and they are tested by expert markers. The findings show that the two models are similar in efficiency, but that a partial marking approach potentially offers an improved efficiency for longer programming solutions. Such a finding has significant potential to reduce time spent on marking throughout the sector, which would have significant impact on both resourcing and timeliness of feedback.

show abstract

Automatic Feedback in the Teaching of Programming in Undergraduate Courses: a Literature Mapping

Conceicao

Holanda

Macedo

et al. 2022

2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new marking technique in semi-automated assessment

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment Tools in the Blended Learning Environment

A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment Tools in the Blended Learning Environment

Improving marking efficiency for longer programming solutions based on a semi‐automated assessment approach

Automatic Feedback in the Teaching of Programming in Undergraduate Courses: a Literature Mapping

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About