2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Measure of Perfectionism: The Perfectionism Inventory

Abstract: In this investigation, we produced a new 8-scale measure of perfectionism called the Perfectionism Inventory (PI) that is designed to capture the important constructs provided by 2 existing Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990; Hewitt & Flett, 1991b) measures, along with new perfectionism scales. In the results from 3 studies, we describe scale development, scale psychometric properties, and criterion-related validity evidence for the 8 PI scales: Concern Over Mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
276
4
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
276
4
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it showed a unique positive relationship with social dominance goals and unique negative relationships with emotionality and altruism that the MPS measure did not show, but failed to show the unique negative relationship with agreeableness that the MPS measure showed (and that is well-established in the previous literature). Consequently, further research is needed on the convergent and divergent validity of the two measures including further measures of otheroriented perfectionism such as the High Standards for Others subscale of the Perfectionism Inventory (Hill et al, 2004) to establish that the 1990 scale is a valid measure of other-oriented perfectionism that can be used as an indicator of narcissistic perfectionism (Nealis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it showed a unique positive relationship with social dominance goals and unique negative relationships with emotionality and altruism that the MPS measure did not show, but failed to show the unique negative relationship with agreeableness that the MPS measure showed (and that is well-established in the previous literature). Consequently, further research is needed on the convergent and divergent validity of the two measures including further measures of otheroriented perfectionism such as the High Standards for Others subscale of the Perfectionism Inventory (Hill et al, 2004) to establish that the 1990 scale is a valid measure of other-oriented perfectionism that can be used as an indicator of narcissistic perfectionism (Nealis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the present study examined multidimensional perfectionism following Frost et al's (1990) and Hewitt and Flett's (1991) models. Although they are the most widely-used models of multidimensional perfectionism, there are other prominent models (e.g., Hill et al, 2004;Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001) that future studies may profit from extending the present research to.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Measures of general perfectionism include the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS; Frost et al, 1990), the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Hewitt & Flett, 1991, the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R; Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001), and the Perfectionism Inventory (PI; R. W. Hill et al, 2004). Measures of perfectionism in sport include the Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (Sport-MPS; Dunn, Causgrove Dunn, & Syrotuik, 2002;revised version: Gotwals & Dunn, 2009) and the Multidimensional Inventory of Perfectionism in Sports (MIPS; Stöber, Otto, & Stoll, 2004;English version: Stoeber, Otto, & Stoll, 2006).…”
Section: Measures [H2]mentioning
confidence: 99%