Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research &Amp; Applications 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2857491.2857503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for categorizing scanpaths from eye tracking data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oculometrics characterize the kinematics of eye movements and pupillary responses. In addition, oculometrics can be defined in relation to the stimuli (e.g., dwell time [45,46], scanpath length [47]). There are several algorithms to identify ocular events as well as various methods to define and compute oculometrics [20,48].…”
Section: Vestibulo-ocularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oculometrics characterize the kinematics of eye movements and pupillary responses. In addition, oculometrics can be defined in relation to the stimuli (e.g., dwell time [45,46], scanpath length [47]). There are several algorithms to identify ocular events as well as various methods to define and compute oculometrics [20,48].…”
Section: Vestibulo-ocularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinates of the eye fixation points were associated with the time-ordered eye fixation indices, which provided the sequential order of each eye fixations. By considering the overall area, data required less adjustment prior to the analysis, and the holistic visual scanning trajectories among the indicators were captured (Haass, Matzen, Butler, and Armenta, 2016). The scanning trajectory consisted of three elements: "X, Y" coordinates of eye fixations, and the timestamps of when the fixations were made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity, or Stimuli Inference holds publications that focus on predicting the activity or stimulus based on the assumption that different stimuli and activities produce different scanpath data. For activity prediction, the activities were often diverse, including viewing natural images, web surfing, or watching a video (Greene et al, 2012 ; Kanan et al, 2014 ; Haass et al, 2016 ; Martinez et al, 2017 ; Coutrot et al, 2018 ; Hild et al, 2018 ; Srivastava et al, 2018 ; Kucharský et al, 2020 ; Lan et al, 2020 ). However, some publications focused on specific tasks such as driving cars (Lethaus et al, 2013 ), piloting plans (Peysakhovich et al, 2022 ), or reading text (Biedert et al, 2012 ; Kelton et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Domains and Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%