1991
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8141(91)90014-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for checking the driving visibility on hydraulic excavators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, cabin pillars of 50, 75 and 100 mm were noted to mask the operator field of view by 58%, 55% and 64%, respectively, at an angle of 251. Trends similar to this were observed also in Hella et al (1991) in the evaluation of the field of view for an excavator.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, cabin pillars of 50, 75 and 100 mm were noted to mask the operator field of view by 58%, 55% and 64%, respectively, at an angle of 251. Trends similar to this were observed also in Hella et al (1991) in the evaluation of the field of view for an excavator.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Apart from locating the blind areas associated with specific machines and machine features, this may also allow for a quantified assessment of ergonomic features related to operator-workspace interaction. In this regard, Hella et al (1991) developed a technique based on photography of the field of view (Hella et al, 1991). Two-dimensional visibility photographs of 15 machines were taken using a special camera, which did not deform the cylinder of vision, and hence allowed for surface analysis without a reference screen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous LOS evaluations occurred in the field and required substantial time and resources with little versatility in the plots that were produced (Hella et al, 1991;Eger et al, 2004). A new laser-scanning method introduced by Bhattacherya et al (2007) demonstrated good correspondence to the light filament method (range of error from 1.7% to 5.2%) used by Eger et al (2004) and had the added advantage of being a significantly faster method of evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A driver’s poor vision of the operating machine caused by an inappropriate design of the driver’s cabin of a movable component can lead to property damage or industrial accidents. A survey conducted by Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Maladie (French National Insurance Fund) on earth-moving machines showed, for example, that a third of serious and fatal accidents are caused by the lack of visibility from the driver’s cab [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%