2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra05079h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for fast statistical measurement of interfacial misfit strain around nano-scale semi-coherent particles

Abstract: Nanoscale diffraction contrast reveals strain field distribution at a semi-coherent interface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moiré pattern generally appears due to superposition of two different materials with small lattice difference. The lattice mismatch between Bi 2 S 3 and Cu 3 BiS 3 in the core region of the nanorod is minimum, which results in the formation of Moiré pattern. ,, The FFT pattern in Figure S4b demonstrates the closer existence of the two spots belonging to the (211) plane of Bi 2 S 3 ( d spacing 0.301 nm) and (220) plane of Cu 3 BiS 3 ( d spacing 0.309 nm), which makes an angle of nearly 10°. The calculated spacing ( d M ) of the Moiré pattern by masking the two spots is 1.71 nm, as demonstrated in Figure S4c.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moiré pattern generally appears due to superposition of two different materials with small lattice difference. The lattice mismatch between Bi 2 S 3 and Cu 3 BiS 3 in the core region of the nanorod is minimum, which results in the formation of Moiré pattern. ,, The FFT pattern in Figure S4b demonstrates the closer existence of the two spots belonging to the (211) plane of Bi 2 S 3 ( d spacing 0.301 nm) and (220) plane of Cu 3 BiS 3 ( d spacing 0.309 nm), which makes an angle of nearly 10°. The calculated spacing ( d M ) of the Moiré pattern by masking the two spots is 1.71 nm, as demonstrated in Figure S4c.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These particles exhibit interesting features, as depicted in the magnified area shown in the inset (Figure 3D). The nanoparticles shown in the inset of Figure 3D have a large atomic lattice spacing of 2.77 nm caused by interfacial misfit strain dislocations in the nanoparticle, 64 which are most likely aluminum nanoparticles, similar to those shown in Figure 3B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These contrasts are a typical indicator for local elastic strain in the crystal lattice, and the origin of them is attributed to coherent precipitates. [ 51,52 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contrasts are a typical indicator for local elastic strain in the crystal lattice, and the origin of them is attributed to coherent precipitates. [51,52] Kumar et al [53] studied the formation of secondary defects in Mg-implanted GaN ([Mg] ¼ 10 19 cm À3 ) after annealing at 1000À1300 °C (5 min, atmospheric pressure) using LAADF-STEM and APT. After annealing at 1100 °C, small Mg clusters started to appear, and their number density and size increase as increasing annealing temperature.…”
Section: Impact Of N-implantation On Mg Activation and Secondary Defe...mentioning
confidence: 99%