1994
DOI: 10.1038/ki.1994.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: The RXc graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
537
0
21

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 598 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
15
537
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 First, we measured impedance vectors shorter than normal in about 50% of obese and 100% of edematous patients, which were well separable by a boundary line allowing 91% correct allocation, due to the difference in the phase angle of vectors (Figure 2). Therefore, in addition to con®rming the pattern of mean vectors from subject groups with fat or¯uid overload recognized in a previous pilot study, 8 we could mark a border on the lower pole of the genderspeci®c 75% tolerance ellipse discriminating between fat and¯uid overload in the individual subject. Interestingly, the lower pole of the gender-speci®c 75% tolerance ellipse still behaved as threshold for apparent edema with larger groups and different ellipses than previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22,23 First, we measured impedance vectors shorter than normal in about 50% of obese and 100% of edematous patients, which were well separable by a boundary line allowing 91% correct allocation, due to the difference in the phase angle of vectors (Figure 2). Therefore, in addition to con®rming the pattern of mean vectors from subject groups with fat or¯uid overload recognized in a previous pilot study, 8 we could mark a border on the lower pole of the genderspeci®c 75% tolerance ellipse discriminating between fat and¯uid overload in the individual subject. Interestingly, the lower pole of the gender-speci®c 75% tolerance ellipse still behaved as threshold for apparent edema with larger groups and different ellipses than previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The RXc graph method. 8 Using the bivariate normal distribution of RaH and XcaH, we calculated the bivariate 95% con®dence limits 20,21 for mean impedance vectors of the different classi®cation groups that is, the ellipse containing the mean vectors with 95% probability) (Figure 1). Noteworthy, due to equivalence of numerical and graphical criterion (bivariate con®-dence interval) in vector analysis, two mean vectors with non overlapping 95% con®dence ellipses are considered signi®cantly (P`0.05) different also using the Hotelling's T 2 test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the vectorial approach of BIA, called bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA), the individual components of the impedance vector, resistance (R) and reactance (Xc), are normalized by the height of the subject (R/H and Xc/H) and represented in the R-Xc graph (abscissa, R/H; ordinate, Xc/H) [19]. R is inversely related to the intra-and extracellular water (ICW and ECW), whereas Xc is directly related to the amount of soft tissue structures (mass).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIVA approach developed by Piccoli et al (1994) uses the plot of the impedance parameters resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) normalized per height as a bivariate vector in the RXc graph. The position and length of the vector provides information about hydration status, body cell mass and cell integrity (Norman et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%