1990
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540110604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for the calculation of atomic and local hardness

Abstract: The relationships between atomic hardness, atomic electronegativity, and electronic energy are considered and emphasized. A new method for calculating atomic hardness is described. The concept of local hardness is quantified through the calculation of a new variable named alfahardness. Atomic hardness and alfahardness are used for the calculation of both the mean molecular and local properties. The results obtained are discussed and a comparison made with the analogous quantities presented by Pearson. An algor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend in B , shown in Table , supports this idea because B , and so the gradient of the intra‐atomic energy, increases from nitrogen to fluorine. This would suggest that nitrogen is the ‘softest’ of the three atoms and fluorine the ‘hardest’, which is in agreement with chemical intuition and the literature . This trend is seen more than once in our work; further details are shown in the Supporting Information in Table S7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trend in B , shown in Table , supports this idea because B , and so the gradient of the intra‐atomic energy, increases from nitrogen to fluorine. This would suggest that nitrogen is the ‘softest’ of the three atoms and fluorine the ‘hardest’, which is in agreement with chemical intuition and the literature . This trend is seen more than once in our work; further details are shown in the Supporting Information in Table S7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This would suggest that nitrogen is the 'softest' of the three atoms and fluorine the 'hardest', which is in agreement with chemical intuition and the literature. [50][51][52] This trend is seen more than once in our work; further details are shown in the Figure 4. Decomposed intra-atomic energy for the nitrogen atoms at q ¼ 90 � in the N 2 dimer theta scan (a); decomposed intra-atomic energy for the nitrogen atoms at q ¼ 10 � in the NH 3 dimer theta scan (b).…”
Section: Hydrogen-x Approachessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The methods implemented in the Beppe program to evaluate the reactivity are based on the calculations of atomic and molecular properties of reactants, defined in the frame of the density functional theory, including electronic energies, electronegativities, hardness, and other related reactivity descriptors [93,94]. They are used to select the reactive sites in the reactants and evaluate the imaginary intermediate, interpreted as an approximated model of the transition state.…”
Section: Quantitative Models For Reactivity Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g is the electronic chemical potential [21] of the species. Using again a finite difference approximation (assuming energy depends quadratically with N), (5) Atomic and molecular global hardnesses have been computed by different means [33][34][35][36] and the concept of hardness has been used to understand aromaticity in organic [37][38] and organometallic molecules [39]. The Relative hardness concept was introduced to characterize aromatic and anti-aromatic species [40] and the activation hardness index is useful to predict the orientation of electrophilic aromatic substitution in organic chemistry [41].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%