2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for TOC estimation in tight shale gas reservoirs

Abstract: Total organic carbon (TOC) estimation is significantly crucial for shale reservoir characterization. Traditional TOC estimation methods (such as Passey and Schmoker method) do not provide accurate TOC predictions in shale gas reservoirs especially for the self-generated and self-stored reservoirs. This study proposes, for the first time, a new TOC prediction method based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) bridging geostatistics and machine learning technique. The method utilizes a non-parametric regression a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the scale range is too large, noise data is generated, which increases the possibility of overfitting. It also causes the disappearance of connections between neurons through the activation function [49,50]. If the scales are different, the possibility of data characteristics being biased in one direction increases.…”
Section: Dataset Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the scale range is too large, noise data is generated, which increases the possibility of overfitting. It also causes the disappearance of connections between neurons through the activation function [49,50]. If the scales are different, the possibility of data characteristics being biased in one direction increases.…”
Section: Dataset Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the third artificial intelligence boom, machine learning has been widely used for lithology identification [23][24][25] and reservoir evaluation [26,27]. Machine learning methods for TOC content prediction include support vector machine (SVM) [28,29], Gaussian process regression (GPR) [30,31], extreme learning machine (ELM) [32,33], neural network [34,35], fuzzy clustering [36], and random forest (RF) [37]. Machine learning is data-driven, which improves the accuracy and efficiency of TOC prediction compared to conventional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI techniques are known to have the capability to generate high accuracy models; therefore, several studies utilized them in TOC prediction [26,27]. In the appendix, Table 2 summarizes the different research studies that utilized AI techniques to estimate the TOC from well logs [8,9,14,17,18,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. e used well logs include formation resistivity (FR), spontaneous potential (SP), sonic transit time (Δt), bulk density (RHOB), neutron porosity (CNP), gamma ray (GR), and spectrum logs of thorium ( ), potassium (K), and uranium (Ur).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%