2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method of diametrical core deformation analysis for in-situ stress measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…a hydraulic fracturing test nearby the initial location of the core sample, combining that information with the differential stress from DCDA. As for all strain analysis approaches, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio have to be determined and the rock must meet the requirements of homogeneity, isotropy and linear elasticity (Funato and Ito 2017).…”
Section: Tests On Core Samples In Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a hydraulic fracturing test nearby the initial location of the core sample, combining that information with the differential stress from DCDA. As for all strain analysis approaches, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio have to be determined and the rock must meet the requirements of homogeneity, isotropy and linear elasticity (Funato and Ito 2017).…”
Section: Tests On Core Samples In Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the DCDA, the differential stress in the plane normal to a borehole is estimated from an azimuthal variation in diameter of a boring core sample (Funato and Ito, 2017). It is assumed that the core sample expands elastically in response to a stress relief when the core is cut from the rock mass by boring.…”
Section: Diametrical Core Deformation Analysis (Dcda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable 0 represents diameter of the core sample before it expands in response to the stress relief. Since it is impossible to know 0 with such a high accuracy as its expansion (~1 m) in most cases, Funato and Ito (2017) assumed that ( − 0 ) ≪ 0 and that − 0 can be replaced by…”
Section: Diametrical Core Deformation Analysis (Dcda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these is the down-sized compact conical-ended borehole overcoring (CCBO) technique, Sugawara and Obara (1999), which enhances the calibration of stress modelling Ogasawara et al (2012Ogasawara et al ( , 2014b; and Hofmann et al (2013), and improves the understanding of stress states in earthquake-prone ground. As Yabe et al (2019) detail, additional core-stress-measurements deformation rate analysis (DRA; Yamamoto, 2009) and diametrical core deformation analysis (DCDA; Funato and Ito, 2017) were carried out on the dyke core samples, resulting in much better constraints on the stress state in the seismogenic zone. The CCBO stress-measurement technique proved the existence of a normal-faulting stress regime at mining horizons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%