1988
DOI: 10.1115/1.3108413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method of Measuring the Cross-Sectional Area of Connective Tissue Structures

Abstract: There appears to be no generally accepted method of measuring in-situ the cross-sectional area of connective tissues, particularly small ones, before mechanical testing. An instrument has therefore been devised to measure the cross-sectional area of one such tissue, the rabbit medial collateral ligament, directly and nondestructively. However, the methodology is general and could be applied to other tissues with appropriate changes in detail. The concept employed in the instrument is to measure the thickness o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, after removing a small portion of the medial femoral condyle, the cross-sectional area of the MCL was measured using a custom designed crosssectional area caliper. 46 A hydration bath was then set up around the joint with 0.9% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 378C. For cyclic force relaxation, the ligament was cycled 30 times at 10 mm/min from the zero position to 0.68 mm displacement at which an average strain of about 3% was produced in the femur-MCL-tibia complex.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, after removing a small portion of the medial femoral condyle, the cross-sectional area of the MCL was measured using a custom designed crosssectional area caliper. 46 A hydration bath was then set up around the joint with 0.9% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 378C. For cyclic force relaxation, the ligament was cycled 30 times at 10 mm/min from the zero position to 0.68 mm displacement at which an average strain of about 3% was produced in the femur-MCL-tibia complex.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCL length was measured at the transition between periosteal and ligamentous tissue at both femoral and tibia1 insertions using Vernier calipers (accurate to 0.01 mm). For clearance of our area caliper [13], a small portion of the medial femoral condyle lateral to the MCL and distal to the femoral MCL insertion was removed. Then, 5 N of tension was maintained, and the caliper traversed the midsubstance of the ligament.…”
Section: Mclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligament laxity was determined in a manner similar to that of Chimich et al (1991) and the cross-sectional area of the mid-substance of the MCL measured with a specially designed instrument (Shrive et al 1988). Laxity is a low-load measure which can be defined as the distance which the cross-head of the test machine travels, going from joint compression to the point where the MCL first experiences tension (Chimich et al 1990).…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%