2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1489-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model for separation between brain dopamine and serotonin transporters in 123I-?-CIT SPECT measurements: normal values and sex and age dependence

Abstract: 123I-beta-CIT is a radioactive ligand for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the pre-synaptic (transporter) re-uptake sites for dopamine (DAT) and serotonin (5HTT), and it is widely used to visualize monoamine turnover. Since 123I-beta-CIT uptake occurs at 5HTT and DAT sites in conjunction with the presence of freely soluble 123I-beta-CIT in brain tissue, adequate separation of these three components is necessary. However, only partial separation is possible with current methods. Two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific binding of [ 123 I]β-CIT to SERT declined by 5% per decade in the diencephalon of healthy subjects (Pirker et al, 2000) or by 4.2% per decade in brainstem-diencephalon (van Dyck et al, 2000). However, others reported no correlation of SERT with age (Ryding et al, 2004) or an only 2% decline per decade in healthy women (Kuikka et al, 2001). Thus, our findings of a 4.4% decline in DAT and a 4.2% decline in SERT per decade of aging are within the corresponding ranges of earlier estimates in healthy subjects, suggesting no main effect of MDD on monoamine transporter changes with age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The specific binding of [ 123 I]β-CIT to SERT declined by 5% per decade in the diencephalon of healthy subjects (Pirker et al, 2000) or by 4.2% per decade in brainstem-diencephalon (van Dyck et al, 2000). However, others reported no correlation of SERT with age (Ryding et al, 2004) or an only 2% decline per decade in healthy women (Kuikka et al, 2001). Thus, our findings of a 4.4% decline in DAT and a 4.2% decline in SERT per decade of aging are within the corresponding ranges of earlier estimates in healthy subjects, suggesting no main effect of MDD on monoamine transporter changes with age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is in agreement with some studies which also could not detect an effect of gender on FP-CIT uptake or F-DOPA uptake [45,46]. However, other studies have suggested that DAT tracer and F-DOPA uptake values are higher in women than in men [34,[47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Besides the lack of selectivity of b-CIT, our approach to investigate DAT and SERT in the same SPECT session approximately 20-24 h after injection of the tracer is a matter of discussion and has been criticized. Ryding et al (2004) presented a new analytical model for the separation of DAT and SERT in b-CIT-SPECT measurements. Based on SPECT recordings at 1, 6, and 22 h after injection of b-CIT and using citalopram in order to block SERT uptake in the course of the experiment, the authors could demonstrate a successful separation of SERT and DAT, which is a clear advantage of this method compared with our approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given functional interactions between monoaminergic systems (Moukhles et al, 1997;Kugaya et al, 2003), this would not be contradictory to the notion of LD as a clinical serotonergic marker (Hegerl et al, 2001;Croft et al, 2001). New models for b-CIT measurements with an improved separation of b-CIT binding to SERT and DAT as proposed by Ryding et al (2004), as well as the use of highly selective radioligands for SERT, such as ADAM for SPECT or DASB for PET (Oya et al, 2000;Kauppinen et al, 2003;Wilson et al, 2002;Frankle et al, 2004), might help to advance in vivo studies and to investigate the different aspects of central monoaminergic function more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%