2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3128953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Multi Attribute Decision Making Method Based on the T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Sets

Abstract: In this paper, we first introduce the concept of T-spherical hesitant fuzzy set (T-SHFS) on the basis of the combination of T-spherical fuzzy sets(T-SFSs) and hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs). This model can provide more accuracy in expressing fuzzy and indeterminate data. Then, we develop the basic operational laws of T-SHFSs and study their properties. Also, we propose the T-spherical hesitant fuzzy weighted averaging (T-SHFWA) operator and the T-spherical hesitant fuzzy weighted geometric (T-SHFWG) operatorand in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this article only discusses the proposed model in the case of attribute values as SFNs. But in the actual decision, many complex information forms may appear in the evaluation process due to the uncertainty of DMs and the diversity of attributes, such as spherical linguistic FSs (Ashraf et al 2018 ), spherical soft FSs (Perveen et al 2019 ), T-spherical hesitant FSs (Al-Quran 2021 ) and interval-valued T-SFSs (Garg et al 2022 ). Therefore, in future studies, we will also focus on the further extension of the CPT–CoCoSo method in the aforementioned environment to develop more MAGDM models for dealing with various uncertain problems (Zhang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2014 ; Lu et al 2019 ; Wang et al 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this article only discusses the proposed model in the case of attribute values as SFNs. But in the actual decision, many complex information forms may appear in the evaluation process due to the uncertainty of DMs and the diversity of attributes, such as spherical linguistic FSs (Ashraf et al 2018 ), spherical soft FSs (Perveen et al 2019 ), T-spherical hesitant FSs (Al-Quran 2021 ) and interval-valued T-SFSs (Garg et al 2022 ). Therefore, in future studies, we will also focus on the further extension of the CPT–CoCoSo method in the aforementioned environment to develop more MAGDM models for dealing with various uncertain problems (Zhang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2014 ; Lu et al 2019 ; Wang et al 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison and the variation of the ranking results are tabulated and represented graphically. We aim to extend the MSM to frameworks defined in Akram and Khan (2021), Naz (2019), andAl-Quran (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Sharqi et al [51] proposed the notion of FP-interval complex neutrosophic soft sets and their applications under uncertainty. Many researchers extended fuzzy sets and soft sets to wards MCDM such as T-spherical hesitant fuzzy sets [52], bipolar fuzzy soft sets [53], almost convergence [54], soft union ideals and near-rings [55,56], LDFS sine-trigonometric aggregation operators [57], LBWA and Z-MABAC methods [58].…”
Section: Kernel Fuzzy Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%