2021
DOI: 10.1177/1077546320983192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new numeric–symbolic procedure for variational iteration method with application to the free vibration of generalized multi-span Timoshenko beam

Abstract: In this article, a novel approach is introduced for the free vibration analysis of beams based upon the variational iteration method. The new approach uses a numeric–symbolic procedure that tackles the problem of increased execution time involved in symbolic integrations. This drawback is usually encountered in solving complicated free vibration problems such as stepped beams connected to lumped parameter subsystems. The proposed procedure is applied for free vibration analysis of a generalized multi-span Timo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of shear deformations in elastic beams was first demonstrated by Timoshenko (1921) and Timoshenko beam theory can be considered as a first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT). Timoshenko beam theory is widely used for thick beams (Cheng et al, 2011; El-Sayed and Farghaly, 2018, 2020; El-Sayed and El-Mongy, 2021; Elsawaf et al, 2020; Farghaly and El-Sayed, 2016, 2017; Kaya and Dowling, 2016; Yardimoglu, 2010). In this case, a plane section again remains plane after deformation, as shown in Figure 1(c); however, the assumption that the plane remains perpendicular to the beam axis is relaxed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of shear deformations in elastic beams was first demonstrated by Timoshenko (1921) and Timoshenko beam theory can be considered as a first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT). Timoshenko beam theory is widely used for thick beams (Cheng et al, 2011; El-Sayed and Farghaly, 2018, 2020; El-Sayed and El-Mongy, 2021; Elsawaf et al, 2020; Farghaly and El-Sayed, 2016, 2017; Kaya and Dowling, 2016; Yardimoglu, 2010). In this case, a plane section again remains plane after deformation, as shown in Figure 1(c); however, the assumption that the plane remains perpendicular to the beam axis is relaxed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%