2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new paradigm in treatment of brain metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between HM or PHM and age is unclear. However, studies have found that older age is a poor prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic disease in the brain [ 23 26 ]. The survival of younger patients with metastatic disease in the brain have a longer life expectancy, and the probability of progression of brain metastases may potentially increase, thereby increasing the probability of HM and PHM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between HM or PHM and age is unclear. However, studies have found that older age is a poor prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic disease in the brain [ 23 26 ]. The survival of younger patients with metastatic disease in the brain have a longer life expectancy, and the probability of progression of brain metastases may potentially increase, thereby increasing the probability of HM and PHM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no definite agreement about the influence of age on metastatic tumors with regard to different distances in the hippocampus, predicting that age may be closely related to the prognosis of patients with intracranial metastasis. Relevant studies show that age is an adverse factor for the prognosis of patients with intracranial metastasis [26, 27]. The younger patients have the higher probability of progressive disease, due to their longer life expectancy, thus the potential possibility of hippocampal metastatic lesion or recurrence is higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFIGMI–VMAT has the radiobiological advantage of fractionation, whereas GK-SRS is administered in one to three fractions [25, 26]. Radiosurgical doses ranging from 15 to 24 Gy according to tumor diameters have been widely administered as a single treatment [9, 27]; however, tumor size correlates strongly with local tumor control. Vogelbaum et al reported the following results for GK-SRS treatment using the RTOG 90–05 dosing scheme: 1-year local control rate 85% for 20 mm or smaller (24 Gy), 49% for 21–30 mm (18 Gy), and 45% for 31–40 mm (15 Gy) tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of developing new brain metastases increases in parallel with the number of brain metastases present at diagnosis [38, 39]. WBRT has traditionally been the standard treatment for multiple brain metastases; however, the resultant acute toxicities may delay initiation of systemic therapy, and this therapy is associated with an increased risk of late neurocognitive decline [9, 40]. SRS may carry a lower risk of neurocognitive decline; however, whether SRS is indicated in patients with more than four brain metastases is controversial [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation