A New Passenger Oriented Performance Measurement Framework for Public Rail Transportation Systems

Han²,

2018

Reasonable selection of passenger flow routes consideringdifferent transportation organization modes can meetthe demands of adapting to large-scale high-speed railwaynetworks and improving network efficiency. Passenger flowrouting models are developed to find and optimize a setof passenger flow routes for a high-speed railway network considering different transportation organization modes. In this paper, we presented a new approach minimizing the operating costs, including traveling cost, cost of travel time differences between different lines, and penalties for the inter-line. The network was reconstructed to solve the directed graph with four nodes (node-in-up, node-in-down, nodes-outup, and nodes-out-down) indicating one station. To tackle our problem, we presented an integer non-linear programming model, and direct passenger demand was guaranteed owing to volume constraints. Binary variables were introduced to simplify the model, and the algorithm process was optimized. We suggested a global optimal algorithm by Lingo 11.0. Finally, the model was applied to a sub-network of the Northeast China railway system. Passenger flow routes were optimized and the transportation organization mode was discussed based on passenger volume, traveling distance, and infrastructure.

Section: Relevant Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Passenger Flow Routing Model for High-speed Railway Network in Different Transportation Organization Modes

Han²,

2018

“…Customer perception of the quality of service provided by the operator and the level of satisfaction are one of the key parameters to monitor performance. Kesten and Öğüt [1] present a practical approach for monitoring public transportation system performance by focusing on the passengers' evaluations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Criteria Evaluation and the Inverse Hierarchy Model for Justifying the Choice of Rail Transport Mode

Sivilevičius

Maskeliūnaitė

2018

The choice of a particular mode of transport as an alternative to another one is subjective and usually based on an individual passenger’s approach to the evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of some particular means of transport. The paper presents the methods of analysing the reasons for passengers’ choice of travelling by train as an alternative to using air transport and the results obtained in the research. The 16 criteria (sub-criteria), describing the advantages of travelling by rail over air travel, are defined. The data of the survey questionnaire filled by 52 passengers of the Vilnius–Moscow train and the ranks assigned by them to the considered criteria are described. The average ranks of all 16 criteria and their normalized subjective weights are calculated by using a new method of average rank transformation into weight (ARTIW). The average ranks assigned by the passengers of the train to sub-criteria and the calculated global weights show what criteria are most important. Using the inverse hierarchy model based on the sub-criteria weights, the most and the least important groups of criteria are determined. The institutions and companies engaged in passenger transportation by rail, which give priority to improving the services described by the most important criteria, can make this mode of transport more attractive to people.

“…Kesten and Öğüt [7] developed a measurement framework of passenger-oriented performance to evaluate rail transportation, using satisfaction and importance ratings obtained from passenger surveys.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Matulin et al [6] proposed a two-level evaluation method to analyze public transport performances from micro and macro levels, using performance indicators and quality of service indicators. Kesten and Öğüt [7] developed a measurement framework of passenger-oriented performance to evaluate rail transportation, using satisfaction and importance ratings obtained from passenger surveys.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Key Station Identification Method for Urban Rail Transit: A Case Study of Beijing Subway

Sun

2017

INTRODUCTIONWith the rapid development of urban rail transit network operation technique, the increase of passenger volume leads to congestion in stations [1], causing even safety risk in the network [2]. Besides, the topology of urban rail transit network can also aggravate or relief the congestion situation of subway networks. Therefore, an effective method identified the key station is an imperative to manage the overcrowded urban rail transit.For the factors of the station performance, many of the current approaches focus on the relationship between passenger flow and facility capacity. Xu et al.[3] combined queuing theory with facility utilization evaluation to conduct the station capacity evaluation, according to the gathering and scattering process of a station. Kepaptsoglou and Karlaftis [4] proposed a model to evaluate passenger evolution on subway station platforms, which usually gathered most passengers. Wang et al.[5] also used the passenger evacuation capacity to evaluate the station based on the facility utilization. If the service level of the facility is too low, there are big problems in the station.Besides, passengers' subjective feelings and other factors are also used for evaluation. Matulin et al.[6] proposed a two-level evaluation method to analyze public transport performances from micro and macro levels, using performance indicators and quality of service indicators. Kesten and Öğüt [7] developed a measurement framework of passenger-oriented performance to evaluate rail transportation, using satisfaction and importance ratings obtained from passenger surveys.Meanwhile, there are many approaches employed in the station evaluation. Some typical methods such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) have played their great role in the station assessment. Sancha et al. [8] used the method to estimate the technical, social and environmental efficiency of transit transfer stations. Pjevčević et al. [9] used DEA method to measure and analyze the efficiencies of ports on the Danube River, which can be borrowed for station evaluation. In addition, simulation is also another method, where relevant simulation or operation data are provided. Zhang et al. [10] proposed a cellular automata-based model to simulate passengers' alighting and boarding behaviours in metro stations, aiming to analyze and evaluate the operation performance of stations. However, most works above do not consider the influence of other stations in the subway system, which results in local rather than global conclusions.Fortunately, in recent years, a complex network theory has been introduced to the station evaluation from a global viewpoint. Indexes such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality have an outstanding ability to identify key nodes from the network [11][12][13][14]. Sheikhahmadi et al. [12] proposed an improved high degree centrality index to identify the Traffic Management Original Scientific Paper