2016 Sixth International Conference on Instrumentation &Amp; Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/imccc.2016.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Positioning Method for Indoor Laser Navigation on Under-Determined Condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5a and b, after the prediction step [18], the ref ector's position measured by the laser navigation, is converted to a Cartesian coordinate system at the particle position to correct the system state. actual ref ector, the more likely the real vehicle robot is located on the particle as it approaches zero.…”
Section: Proposed Positioning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 5a and b, after the prediction step [18], the ref ector's position measured by the laser navigation, is converted to a Cartesian coordinate system at the particle position to correct the system state. actual ref ector, the more likely the real vehicle robot is located on the particle as it approaches zero.…”
Section: Proposed Positioning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure5aand b, after the prediction step[18], the ref ector's position measured by the laser navigation, is converted to a Cartesian coordinate system at the particle position to correct the system state. The distance difference as ref ector 1, ref ector 2, and ref ector 3, from the known ref ectors and LRF, which usually match the detected and measured ref ector marks within its working environment, is calculated.In Fig.5b, the gray that shows the measured ref ector and the black circle represent the actual ref ector's information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific steps are as follows: The first step is calculating all the triangles. The set of triangles in coordinate system XOY of the first frame is shown as Tri = {hij, hik, hil, hig, hjk, hjl, hjg, hkl, hkg, hlg, ijk, ijl, ijg, ikl, ikg, ilg, jkl, jkg, jlg, klg} (15) Due to measurement error, three theoretically collinear reflectors such as BCD and EFG can still form a triangle. The set of triangles in coordinate system X O Y of the second frame is shown as: Tri = {bcd, bce, bc f , bca, bde, bd f , bda, be f , bea, b f a, cde, cd f , cda, ce f , cea, c f a, de f , dea, d f a, e f a} (16) Every triangle symbol in these two sets stores the lengths of the three lines formed by the three reflectors.…”
Section: Improved Reflector Positioning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, the average error is less than 0.0483 m. In summary, the proposed method is more stable and robust than the traditional reflector positioning system and ICP algorithm, and is cheaper. The precision of reflector positioning system proposed by Xu et al [15] is better than 0.08 m with the AGV route known in advance. The positioning method proposed in this paper is more precise and has an error less than 0.0483 m without the limit of knowing the route in advance.…”
Section: Performance Of the Proposed Positioning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation