2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new sensitivity-preferred strategy to build prediction rules for therapy response of cancer patients using gene expression data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of miR-18b and miR-20a expression during CRT can be used as a predictor for negative postoperative nodal stage. Different strategies to choose appropriate cut-offs for predictors are available [12], relating to a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. For further analyses we chose a conservative cut-off at 4 % decrease, in order to strengthen specificity and minimize the false positive rate.…”
Section: The Reduction Of the Expression Of Mir-18b And Mir-20a Durin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of miR-18b and miR-20a expression during CRT can be used as a predictor for negative postoperative nodal stage. Different strategies to choose appropriate cut-offs for predictors are available [12], relating to a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. For further analyses we chose a conservative cut-off at 4 % decrease, in order to strengthen specificity and minimize the false positive rate.…”
Section: The Reduction Of the Expression Of Mir-18b And Mir-20a Durin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It identifies over 1/3 of the patients with pCR in all datasets examined and, most importantly, when considering a possible clinical application, never classifies any patient with an incomplete response as pCR. Unlike previous studies we aimed to predict pCR with the highest accuracy, at the cost of sensitivity [ 58 ]. Allowing mistakes when training a classifier would increase the rate of identifying patients with pCR; however, the clinical benefit of such a predictor would be limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%