2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cmce.2010.5609942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new sorting algorithm for radar emitter recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the value is too small, the calculation time will be longer, and if it is too large, the PRI estimation will be inaccurate, resulting in a larger difference from the true PRI 9 . The CDIF algorithm requires that both the difference value and the two-fold difference value exceed the threshold before sequence retrieval can be carried out, so it is necessary to carry out a large number of calculations to count the multilevel difference histograms, and at the same time, due to the influence of the threshold selection, the false alarm rate of the CDIF algorithm is high, and the PRIs at the subharmonics may exceed the threshold, so that the wrong PRIs are extracted 10 . Compared with the CDIF algorithm, the SDIF algorithm takes into account both the effectiveness of detection and the computational complexity of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the value is too small, the calculation time will be longer, and if it is too large, the PRI estimation will be inaccurate, resulting in a larger difference from the true PRI 9 . The CDIF algorithm requires that both the difference value and the two-fold difference value exceed the threshold before sequence retrieval can be carried out, so it is necessary to carry out a large number of calculations to count the multilevel difference histograms, and at the same time, due to the influence of the threshold selection, the false alarm rate of the CDIF algorithm is high, and the PRIs at the subharmonics may exceed the threshold, so that the wrong PRIs are extracted 10 . Compared with the CDIF algorithm, the SDIF algorithm takes into account both the effectiveness of detection and the computational complexity of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%