1986
DOI: 10.1109/tia.1986.4504778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Synchronous Current Regulator and an Analysis of Current-Regulated PWM Inverters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
137
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (22), (23) and (24) in the dual 3-phase system can be expressed as (27) and (28) respectively. (27) and (28) are exactly the current controllers in dqframe in sub-plane and in dqz-frame in z 1 z 2 sub-plane, shown respectively in Fig.…”
Section: Relationship Between Two-individual Current Control Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (22), (23) and (24) in the dual 3-phase system can be expressed as (27) and (28) respectively. (27) and (28) are exactly the current controllers in dqframe in sub-plane and in dqz-frame in z 1 z 2 sub-plane, shown respectively in Fig.…”
Section: Relationship Between Two-individual Current Control Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delay is formed by the sampling time, digital calculation time, and zero-order hold effect of pulse-width-modulated (PWM) inverter. And it could be described with Padé approximation in (11), where T d is the delay time and equals to 3/2 sampling time [7].…”
Section: Consideration Of System Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should take dual functions of current regulation and selectivity. The proportional-integral (PI) controller in synchronous rotation frame (SRF) is widely considered as the best choice to satisfy these two functions [10], [11]. However, its implementation demands multiple rotation transformations for each selected harmonic, and this number would be doubled when both positive-and negative-sequence components need to be compensated, which means the PI controller in SRF is not a computation-efficient choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…속도 제어기로는 PI 제어기가 사용되었으며 속도 제 어기 이득은   =0.07,   =0.07이다. 내부 루프의 전류 제어기로는 동기좌표계 PI 비결합 전류 제어가 [12] 사용 되었으며 전류 제어기의 대역폭은 200 Hz로 설정되었 다 [13] . 또한, 3절에서 설명된 고정자 권선 고장을 검출 할 수 있는 진단 알고리즘이 구현되었으며 시스템이 정상인 상태에서 q축 전류의 2차 고조파를 검출할 수 있는 알고리즘이 DSP로 구현되어 그림 6의 데이터가 사전에 측정되었다.…”
Section: 고정자 권선 단락에 의한 고장 모델unclassified