2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique for studying the behaviour of concrete in shear

Abstract: The direct determination of shear characteristics of concrete by universal tests is still a major concern for researchers. Most available studies use a torque that is applied to a hollow cylinder with a thickness/radius ratio as small as possible. This serves to develop a test based on the behaviour of the material and not the structure. However, these tests may show dispersions due to problems of fragility or non-homogeneity of the material.For this, an original experimental device has been used by creating t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the capacity curves are also used for civil protection purposes, namely for assessing the degree of damage associated with any given earthquake scenario [16], and not only for assessing the seismic safety level that is established in the EC3-3, a different approach was adopted in the context of the PERSISTAH project, which was already used in past seismic assessment studies [26], namely: if the NC shear capacity limit was reached during the iterative process, which corresponds to the shear capacity that is given by Equation (A.12) of EC8-3, then the shear strength was reduced to a value corresponding to 20% of the initial shear strength without stopping the pushover analysis. This value is the SeismoStruct default option, which agrees with results obtained from some laboratorial tests results [27]. The EC8-1 establishes that it is necessary to consider three positions of the MC (to account for the accidental eccentricity) for each horizontal direction and two different patterns of force distribution (an "uniform" distribution, which is obtained by considering φi = 1, and a "modal" distribution, which in the present study was considered equal to shape deformation associated with the vibration mode with the highest participation factor in each direction), as schematized in Figure 9.…”
Section: The Obtained Capacity Curvessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Because the capacity curves are also used for civil protection purposes, namely for assessing the degree of damage associated with any given earthquake scenario [16], and not only for assessing the seismic safety level that is established in the EC3-3, a different approach was adopted in the context of the PERSISTAH project, which was already used in past seismic assessment studies [26], namely: if the NC shear capacity limit was reached during the iterative process, which corresponds to the shear capacity that is given by Equation (A.12) of EC8-3, then the shear strength was reduced to a value corresponding to 20% of the initial shear strength without stopping the pushover analysis. This value is the SeismoStruct default option, which agrees with results obtained from some laboratorial tests results [27]. The EC8-1 establishes that it is necessary to consider three positions of the MC (to account for the accidental eccentricity) for each horizontal direction and two different patterns of force distribution (an "uniform" distribution, which is obtained by considering φi = 1, and a "modal" distribution, which in the present study was considered equal to shape deformation associated with the vibration mode with the highest participation factor in each direction), as schematized in Figure 9.…”
Section: The Obtained Capacity Curvessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Each incremental static nonlinear structural analysis was carried out until the EC8-3 near collapse (NC) limit state was reached for the chord rotation capacity (Equation (A.1) of the EC8-3), or when it was impossible to reach the convergence of iterative process used in the nonlinear structural analysis. When the NC shear capacity limit was reached (Equation (A.12) of EC8-3), the shear strength was reduced to a value corresponding to only 20% of the original strength (this is the SeismoStruct default option, which seems acceptable when observing some laboratorial tests results [29]).…”
Section: Adopted Mffnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great difficulty is to develop an accurate test setup capable of introducing a pure shear stress field. Several shear test setup configurations have been proposed by various researchers in an attempt of capturing the shear behavior of materials (Ohno 1957;Iosipescu 1967;Banks-Sills and Arcan 1983;Reinhardt et al 1997;Boulifa et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%