1961
DOI: 10.1007/bf00404119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique for the investigation of some analgesic drugs on a reflexive behavior in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
2

Year Published

1963
1963
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scrambled electric shocks were delivered through the grids by a constantcurrent shock generator . Using an ascending method of limits of successively more intense shocks (Evans, 1961), the flinch threshold was defined in milliamperes as the lowest intensity that elicited a withdrawal of a single paw from the grids. The initial jump threshold was defined as the lowest intensity that elicited simultaneous withdrawal of both hindpaws from the grids.…”
Section: Flinch-jump Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scrambled electric shocks were delivered through the grids by a constantcurrent shock generator . Using an ascending method of limits of successively more intense shocks (Evans, 1961), the flinch threshold was defined in milliamperes as the lowest intensity that elicited a withdrawal of a single paw from the grids. The initial jump threshold was defined as the lowest intensity that elicited simultaneous withdrawal of both hindpaws from the grids.…”
Section: Flinch-jump Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen male albino Holtzman Sprague-Dawley rats (350-500 g) were tested for flinch-jump thresholds using a modification of the Evans (1961) .40…”
Section: Flinch-jump Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the following day, the same rats were tested for basal responsivity to the electric shock stimulus in the flinch-jump assay using a modified version of Evans (1961). Each rat was placed in the chamber and presented with a single ascending series of electric shocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%