2015
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new theory on the pathogenesis of acquired cholesteatoma: Mucosal traction

Abstract: Mucosal coupling with traction generated by interaction of migrating opposing surfaces provides the first comprehensive theory that explains the observed characteristics of primary acquired cholesteatoma. The somewhat counterintuitive hypothesis that cholesteatoma is fundamentally a mucosal disease has numerous therapeutic implications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(117 reference statements)
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a similarity was found in the CK distribution of the external canal skin and cholesteatoma in contrast to the middle ear epithelium [12,22]. Nevertheless, this theory could not explain the occurrence of cholesteatoma in ears without TM perforation which is a common situation [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, a similarity was found in the CK distribution of the external canal skin and cholesteatoma in contrast to the middle ear epithelium [12,22]. Nevertheless, this theory could not explain the occurrence of cholesteatoma in ears without TM perforation which is a common situation [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally described by Wittmack, in 1933 and it remained the most widely accepted until now [5,23]. This theory assumed that primary acquired cholesteatoma was preceded by retraction pocket in the region of pars flaccida caused by negative pressure of the middle ear due to variety of factors like Eustachian tube malfunction, habitual sniffing, or small mastoid volume [26-28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations