2015
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new type of anvil in the Acheulian of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel

Abstract: We report here on the identification and characterization of thin basalt anvils, a newly discovered component of the Acheulian lithic inventory of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov (GBY). These tools are an addition to the array of percussive tools (percussors, pitted stones and anvils) made of basalt, flint and limestone. The thin anvils were selected from particularly compact, horizontally fissured zones of basalt flows. This type of fissuring produces a natural geometry of thick and thin slabs. Hominins at GBY had multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percussion is a vital point of contact between the animal and human contexts, although it occurs in very different forms: perhaps 95% used by primates for yielding immediate resources, and perhaps more than 50% by humans for producing tools for future use. Until now, most studies of percussion in archaeology have concentrated on tool production and toolkits, rather than on those activities aimed at yielding immediate resources, with rare exceptions [62]. It is notable that across the many Acheulean assemblages considered here, published information about hammerstones and anvils of all kinds is far more restricted than the information about flaked artefacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percussion is a vital point of contact between the animal and human contexts, although it occurs in very different forms: perhaps 95% used by primates for yielding immediate resources, and perhaps more than 50% by humans for producing tools for future use. Until now, most studies of percussion in archaeology have concentrated on tool production and toolkits, rather than on those activities aimed at yielding immediate resources, with rare exceptions [62]. It is notable that across the many Acheulean assemblages considered here, published information about hammerstones and anvils of all kinds is far more restricted than the information about flaked artefacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also relevant here are site complexes in the Middle East such as Gesher Benot Ya'aqov and 'Ubeidiya [62,63], and further South African sites such as Cave of the Hearths and Wonderwerk Cave [64,65]. Naturally, to take the output from more than a million years and to compare it with the contemporaneity of chimpanzee cultures strains analogy.…”
Section: The Acheulean Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, identifying the type of activity for which these objects were used is more problematic. At present, Gesher Benot Ya’aqov (Israel) is the only ESA site where it has been possible to link pounding tools to nut cracking, as the excellent preservation of the site has allowed identification of different nut species associated with pitted stones [4749]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early Lower Palaeolithic examples comprise cupmarks, anvils, hammerstones and pounders (e.g. [19][20][21][22][23][24]). Implements mainly operating through abrasive motions, such as grinding slabs and handstones (also known as metates and manos), seem to have developed later in South Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%