“…According to this standard model, two types of stationary patterns may exist depending on the frequency f of the applied ac voltage relative to a cutoff frequency f c ; for f < f c (conductive regime), only the charges oscillate with the voltage, while, for f > f c (dielectric regime), the director and the flow velocity change with the field direction. ,,, EC can also be observed under conditions where the feedback loop leading to instability is not obvious. For example, (−, +) materials with initial homeotropic alignment may show a field-induced transition (Fréedericksz transition) from (−, +, h) to (−, +, p) at a threshold voltage U F and an indirect transition to EC at voltages U > U F . − Patterns observed in the case (−, +, p) may also appear for slightly positive Δε (+, +, p) at U < U F . − More recently, it was recognized that the positive feedback loop yielding an instability appears not only in (−, +) materials with initial planar alignment (−, +, p) but also in (+, −) materials with an initial homeotropic alignment (+, −, h), (Figure f). Thus, the comprehensive model of standard electroconvection (s-EC) can generally be applied when Δε and Δσ have opposite signs. − However, clearly different patterns and distinguished stability conditions can appear for (−, −) compounds − and for (+, +) compounds with large dielectric anisotropy, where no instability was initially expected .…”