1980
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.134.2.7352242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new ultrasound tissue-equivalent material.

Abstract: Two limitations on the animal-hide gelatin and graphite powder tissue equivalent (TE) materials are that they cannot be produced consistently with speeds of sound less than 1,570 m/s at room temperature (22 degrees C) and that irreparable damage can result if the materials are raised to temperatures above 32.5 degrees C. An acceptable substitute polysaccharide gel (agar) has a high melting point (78 degrees C) and can be made to exhibit speeds of sound over the range 1,498 m/s to over 1,600 m/s at 22 degrees C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
86
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A further simplification is that a good approximation for the density of most soft tissues is that of water (ρ = 1 g-cm −3 ) (Burlew et al 1980). Technically, the shear modulus of a material refers to a static stress, and in attenuating materials the quantity calculated above can vary with frequency (Auld 1990).…”
Section: Summary Of Inversion Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further simplification is that a good approximation for the density of most soft tissues is that of water (ρ = 1 g-cm −3 ) (Burlew et al 1980). Technically, the shear modulus of a material refers to a static stress, and in attenuating materials the quantity calculated above can vary with frequency (Auld 1990).…”
Section: Summary Of Inversion Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in translating the nonlinearity propagation seen in water to that seen in tissue for the same beam, for most tissue types it is the change in absorption which is the overwhelming consideration, not the change in B/A (Duck 2010). The absorption coefficients for soft tissue in the literature are for lower signal amplitudes than the ∼1 GPa levels found in this paper, and vary considerably (Burley et al 1980;Goss, Johnston & Dunn 1980;Damianou, Sanghvi & Fry 1997;Bailey et al 2003;Zderic et al 2004;Liu et al 2006;Coussios & Roy 2008). To reduce the range of values available even for the restricted amplitude range of clinical diagnostic device output, it is a standard practice to 'derate' the field values measured in water by 0.3 dB cm −1 MHz −1 , and for the data specific to the tissues and amplitudes occurring in this paper, this is also applied to the predicted values here to estimate the signals that would be detected were the fields to propagate through soft tissue.…”
Section: The Effect Of Tissuementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Phantoms or test objects containing agar-based TMMs have been produced for a number of years based on the material developed at the University of Wisconsin (Burlew et al 1980). A contemporary agar-based TMM has been designed and established as part of an International Electrotechnical Commission project (IEC 2001;Teirlinck, Bezemer, Kollmann, Lubbers, Hoskins, Fish, Fredfeldt, & Schaarschmidt 1998).…”
Section: Tissue Mimicking Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%