1989
DOI: 10.1080/02614368900390041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new vision for outdoor leadership theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined approach used as the basis for this study is called the comprehensive-interaction-expectation (CIE) model (Jordan, 1989). This model of leadership focusses on the interactions between group members and leaders, the expectations each holds for the other, recognition and reinforcement of roleoriented behaviours between people in the group, and situational factors that affect all of the preceding components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined approach used as the basis for this study is called the comprehensive-interaction-expectation (CIE) model (Jordan, 1989). This model of leadership focusses on the interactions between group members and leaders, the expectations each holds for the other, recognition and reinforcement of roleoriented behaviours between people in the group, and situational factors that affect all of the preceding components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jordan (1989) clearly mentions the importance of this in her comprehensive -interaction -expectation (CIE) view, where she states 'outdoor leadership is dynamic in nature. Its effectiveness may be measured in the levels of recognition, acceptance, and reinforcement of leader-role behaviours within the scope of the leader -group -situation interactions' (p. 43).…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When the averages are compared, the participants who earns between 1601-2000 TL and 2001-2400 TL have the highest recreational leadership attitude (4.23±0.31; 4.25±0.32) and business ethics view (4.56±0.32; 4.54±0.31). When we look at different levels of academic studies on recreational leadership (Kraus, 1985;Jordan, 1989;Pyke, 1991;Blanchard and Hersey, 1996;Karaküçük and Yetim, 1996;Skully and Jordan, 1996;Edginton, 1997;Propst and Koesler, 1998;Edginton et al, 2002;Körük et al, 2003;Little and Watkins, 2004;Durukan et al, 2007;Yalız Solmaz and Aydın, 2015;Yılmaz et al, 2015;Demirdağ and Güçer, 2018 etc. ) and business ethics (Aldemir, 2012) in recreation and leisure time, it has been observed that studies on qualifications and skills related to recreation leadership are generally conducted and, it was determined that some of the results obtained from this study on animation staff and similar results of these studies showed similarities or parallels.…”
Section: Experience In Animationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When academic studies on leadership and business ethics in recreation and leisure time area are examined, it is observed that there are generally studies related to qualifications and skills related to recreation leadership and the relationship between business ethics and leisure ethics (such as Kraus, 1985;Jordan, 1989;Pyke, 1991;Blanchard and Hersey, 1996;Karaküçük and Yetim, 1996;Skully and Jordan, 1996;Edginton, 1997;Propst and Koesler, 1998;Edginton et al, 2002;Körük et al, 2003;Little and Watkins, 2004;Durukan et al, 2007;Aldemir, 2012;Yalız Solmaz and Aydın, 2015;Yılmaz et al, 2015;Demirdağ and Güçer, 2018). It was determined that some of the results obtained from this research on animation staff and the other studies showed similarities or parallelism.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%