Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2015
DOI: 10.7712/120115.3475.670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Next Generation Scalar Intensity Measure for Analytical Vulnerability Studies

Abstract: Abstract. To assess the seismic performance of a structural system within an analytical context, we need, among others, to specify a ground motion Intensity Measure (IM).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reasonable to assume that at the fundamental period the function uðTÞ is 1, uðT ¼ T 1 Þ ¼ 1, and then decreases on both sides up to 0 when the lower and upper bound Bull Earthquake Eng (2017) Recently, Kazantzi and Vamvatsikos (2015b) proposed for seismic vulnerability studies a new scalar IM that combines the geometric mean concept of spectral accelerations with a significant duration property of the ground motions based on the Arias Intensity.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reasonable to assume that at the fundamental period the function uðTÞ is 1, uðT ¼ T 1 Þ ¼ 1, and then decreases on both sides up to 0 when the lower and upper bound Bull Earthquake Eng (2017) Recently, Kazantzi and Vamvatsikos (2015b) proposed for seismic vulnerability studies a new scalar IM that combines the geometric mean concept of spectral accelerations with a significant duration property of the ground motions based on the Arias Intensity.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aspect that is required in the site-specific seismic hazard assessment of a structure is the choice of an intensity measure (IM), that is, the measure used to characterise the intensity of ground shaking to be linked to different levels of damage when deriving fragility curves. Different types of IMs exist, with each one possessing their own inherent advantages and disadvantages [1][2][3][4][5]. One aspect that is typically desirable from any IM is for it to be efficient, meaning that is should be a relatively accurate predictor of the structural response and subsequently, the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%