1988
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(88)90297-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Determination of continuous pore size distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researches obtained ρ 2 values by comparing the T 2 relaxation distribution with POSD data calculated by MIP (Marschall et al 1995;Kleinberg 1996;Kenyon 1997;Li et al 2008;Minagawa, et al 2008; Yao and Liu 2012), Nitrogen Gas Adsorption or Diffusion measurements (Gallegos and Smith 1988;Hurlimann et al 1994;Sorland et al 2007), Cation Exchange Capacity (Sen et al 1990), Differential Thermal Calorimetry (Ramia et al 2010) and Photo Microscopy or Image Analysis (Howard et al 1993;Kenyon 1997;Arns 2004;Wang 2009) by Kenyon et al (1988), is used to obtain the surface relaxivity coefficient (ρ 2 ) which is…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Relaxivity Coefficient (ρ 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researches obtained ρ 2 values by comparing the T 2 relaxation distribution with POSD data calculated by MIP (Marschall et al 1995;Kleinberg 1996;Kenyon 1997;Li et al 2008;Minagawa, et al 2008; Yao and Liu 2012), Nitrogen Gas Adsorption or Diffusion measurements (Gallegos and Smith 1988;Hurlimann et al 1994;Sorland et al 2007), Cation Exchange Capacity (Sen et al 1990), Differential Thermal Calorimetry (Ramia et al 2010) and Photo Microscopy or Image Analysis (Howard et al 1993;Kenyon 1997;Arns 2004;Wang 2009) by Kenyon et al (1988), is used to obtain the surface relaxivity coefficient (ρ 2 ) which is…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Relaxivity Coefficient (ρ 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desiccation may cause irreversible changes in pore structure, which in turn will affect the actual POSD of the soils. The Image analysis or Microscopy requires approach a large quantity of two-dimensional information for the desired three-dimensional pore structure information and it is time-consuming (Gallegos and Smith 1988;Hinedi et al 1997;Giesche 2006;Kate and Gokhale 2006;Minagawa, et al 2008;Benjamini et al 2014;Wang et al 2016). None of those methods are suitable for this present study because the tested soil is a special kind of low density (dry density, ρ d =1.30 g/cm 3 ) granite residual soil with grain size distribution ranging from gravel to clay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rocks and sediments generally have very broad distributions of pore sizes, and therefore magnetization decays can be expressed as a sum of exponential decays [Gallegos and Smith, 1988]:…”
Section: Core and Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the set of 50 m(T 2i ) was found using a regularized nonlinear leastsquares technique that renders the results smooth and stable in the presence of random noise [Butler et al, 1981]. The function m(T 2 ), conventionally called a T 2 distribution, maps linearly to a volumetrically weighted distribution of pore sizes [Gallegos and Smith, 1988;Kleinberg, 1999]. …”
Section: Core and Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%