2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4976961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A no-go theorem for the n-twistor description of a massive particle

Abstract: It is proved that the n-twistor expression of a particle's four-momentum vector reduces, by a unitary transformation, to the two-twistor expression for a massive particle or the one-twistor expression for a massless particle. Therefore the genuine n-twistor description of a massive particle in four-dimensional Minkowski space fails for the case n ≥ 3.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note also a two-twistor model along the lines of an ambitwistor string[40,41], but focussed on massless particles.2 More generally, n-twistor descriptions were considered with symmetry groups containing SU(n); in the twistor particle programme, particle multiplets were to be understood via the representation theory of such internal symmetry groups. The quantization of massive worldline models based on these descriptions has been studied by a number of authors, see[23,50] and references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also a two-twistor model along the lines of an ambitwistor string[40,41], but focussed on massless particles.2 More generally, n-twistor descriptions were considered with symmetry groups containing SU(n); in the twistor particle programme, particle multiplets were to be understood via the representation theory of such internal symmetry groups. The quantization of massive worldline models based on these descriptions has been studied by a number of authors, see[23,50] and references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have introduced the concepts of colored conformal symmetry U(2N, 2N) and colored twistors to address the inclusion of non-Abelian internal U(N) charges into (spinless massive) conformal particles. It is known that a genuine M-twistor description of a massive particle in four-dimensional Minkowski space fails for the case M ≥ 3 [23]. However, replacing standard twistors by colored twistors provides enough room to accommodate non-Abelian internal degrees of freedom, other than the electric charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it is shown in [22] that only the two-twistor formulation can successfully describe a massive particle in Minkowski space. Moreover, it is proved in [23] that the M-twistor expression of a particle's four-momentum vector reduces to the two-twistor expression for a massive particle or the one-twistor expression for a massless particle. Therefore, they conclude that the genuine M-twistor description of a massive particle in four-dimensional Minkowski space fails for the case M ≥ 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the SU(n) internal symmetries of such n-twistor systems were associated with the zoo of elementary particles: e.g., n = 2 for the weak isospin doublet of leptons and n = 3 for the flavor symmetry of hadrons [84,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115]. However, it rather turns out that a massive particle can only be consistently described with the bi-twistor system [116,117]. Hence we interpret the SU(2) internal symmetry of a bi-twistor as a symmetry of a "kinematic" origin: the massive little group.…”
Section: Massive Ambitwistor Spacementioning
confidence: 99%