2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4920923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-commuting stabilizer formalism

Abstract: We propose a non-commutative extension of the Pauli stabilizer formalism. The aim is to describe a class of many-body quantum states which is richer than the standard Pauli stabilizer states. In our framework, stabilizer operators are tensor products of single-qubit operators drawn from the group αI, X, S , where α = e iπ/4 and S = diag(1, i). We provide techniques to efficiently compute various properties related to bipartite entanglement, expectation values of local observables, preparation by means of quant… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they can be decomposed as a linear superpositions of fundamental anyonic errors (string operators creating pairs of anyons) with a known effect on the Hilbert space. Moreover, the semion code is not a subgroup of the Pauli group since the complex phases entering its definition (see equation (2)) makes impossible to express its generators in terms of tensor products of Pauli matrices [32,33]. Nevertheless, the semion code is still an additive code: the sum of quantum codewords is also a codeword [34].…”
Section: Summary Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they can be decomposed as a linear superpositions of fundamental anyonic errors (string operators creating pairs of anyons) with a known effect on the Hilbert space. Moreover, the semion code is not a subgroup of the Pauli group since the complex phases entering its definition (see equation (2)) makes impossible to express its generators in terms of tensor products of Pauli matrices [32,33]. Nevertheless, the semion code is still an additive code: the sum of quantum codewords is also a codeword [34].…”
Section: Summary Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that a previous study [33] attempted to construct a quantum error correction code using the DS model as the starting point. The main difference with our work is that they construct a non-commuting quantum correcting code, whereas we have succeeded in constructing an extension that belongs to the stabilizer formalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 This class of pure states have been studied in the context of locally maximally entangleable states, [40][41][42] and in relation with mutually unbiased bases. 43 They also reveal typical properties of states that appear in instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) circuits 44,45 and commuting circuits, 46 which are likely to have stronger computational power than classical computers even though they exploit only diagonal gates and a separable pure initial state. However, it had not been yet clari¯ed whether or not the corresponding phase-random states can be e±ciently generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stabilizer states generalize graph states through additional local Clifford operations [55][56][57], which impose parity constraints and extra phases. XS-stabilizer states [32] combines 3-body correlation factors from hypergraph state and parity constraints from stabilizer states. A parity constraint: (v 1 + v 2 + · · · + v k ) mod 2 = 0 can be realized by a hidden neuron that connects to each of these visible neurons v 1 , v 2 , · · · , v k with weight function W (v, h) = iπvh − (ln 2)/4 [58].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%