2017 25th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/med.2017.7984201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonlinear Model Predictive Control scheme for cooperative manipulation with singularity and collision avoidance

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of cooperative transportation of an object rigidly grasped by N robotic agents.In particular, we propose a Nonlinear Model Predictive Control(NMPC) scheme that guarantees the navigation of the object to a desired pose in a bounded workspace with obstacles, while complying with certain input saturations of the agents. Moreover, the proposed methodology ensures that the agents do not collide with each other or with the workspace obstacles as well as that they do not pass through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our overall approach builds on designing a NMPC scheme for the system of the manipulators and the object. The proposed methodology is decentralized, since we do not consider a centralized system that calculates all the control signals and transmits them to the agents, like in our previous work [28]. As expected, this relaxes greatly the computational burden of the NMPC approach, which is also verified by the simulation results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Our overall approach builds on designing a NMPC scheme for the system of the manipulators and the object. The proposed methodology is decentralized, since we do not consider a centralized system that calculates all the control signals and transmits them to the agents, like in our previous work [28]. As expected, this relaxes greatly the computational burden of the NMPC approach, which is also verified by the simulation results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…2). The desired MITL formula is set as: ϕ = [0,∞) {¬obs} ∧ ♦ [6,12] {goal 1 } ∧ ♦ [20,30] Fig. 2 depicts the workspace with RoI, unsafe regions, the nominal trajectory of the robot (orange color), the real trajectory of the robot (black color) and the tube centered along the nominal trajectory.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual Control Inputs ν 1 (t) 2 ν 2 (t) 2 q(t) 2 Fig. 5: The virtual control input signals ν 1 (t) 2 , ν 2 (t) 2 and q(t) 2 of the kinematic model (3). It holds that ν 1 2 ≤ 2, ν 2 2 ≤ 2 and q 2 ≤ 2.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%