2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00900.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonparametric Mean Estimator for Judgment Poststratified Data

Abstract: MacEachern, Stasny, and Wolfe (2004, Biometrics60, 207-215) introduced a data collection method, called judgment poststratification (JPS), based on ideas similar to those in ranked set sampling, and proposed methods for mean estimation from JPS samples. In this article, we propose an improvement to their methods, which exploits the fact that the distributions of the judgment poststrata are often stochastically ordered, so as to form a mean estimator using isotonized sample means of the poststrata. This new est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The types of rankings used were (i) perfect rankings, (ii) random rankings, and (iii) perfectly wrong rankings obtained by ranking the units in each set in an order exactly opposite to the true ordering. For the first two types of rankings, the stochastic ordering assumption used by Ozturk (2007) and Wang et al (2008) holds, but for the third ranking type, that The three types of rankings are perfect rankings, random rankings, and perfectly wrong rankings assumption fails. The set size was fixed at m = 2, and 100,000 samples were simulated for each combination of parent distribution, type of ranking, and average sample size.…”
Section: Lambda =mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The types of rankings used were (i) perfect rankings, (ii) random rankings, and (iii) perfectly wrong rankings obtained by ranking the units in each set in an order exactly opposite to the true ordering. For the first two types of rankings, the stochastic ordering assumption used by Ozturk (2007) and Wang et al (2008) holds, but for the third ranking type, that The three types of rankings are perfect rankings, random rankings, and perfectly wrong rankings assumption fails. The set size was fixed at m = 2, and 100,000 samples were simulated for each combination of parent distribution, type of ranking, and average sample size.…”
Section: Lambda =mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While Ozturk (2007) and Wang et al (2008) used a stochastic-ordering assumption to obtain more efficient inference, the gains offered by our methods do not require any additional assumptions. Nonetheless, our new methods are sometimes every bit as effective as methods that do make a stochastic-ordering assumption.…”
Section: Conclusion and Possible Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Frey and Feeman (2012) showed that the standard mean estimator in the JPS setting is inadmissible under mean square loss function, they then proposed an alternate mean estimator. Another nonparametric mean esti-mator is proposed by Wang et al (2008), by imposing an order constraint on judgment sample means. Frey and Feeman (2013) proposed a conditionally unbiased variance estimator assuming that the post stratum sample sizes are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%