2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/8186976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Normalized Transfer Matrix Method for the Free Vibration of Stepped Beams: Comparison with Experimental and FE(3D) Methods

Abstract: The exact solution for multistepped Timoshenko beam is derived using a set of fundamental solutions. This set of solutions is derived to normalize the solution at the origin of the coordinates. The start, end, and intermediate boundary conditions involve concentrated masses and linear and rotational elastic supports. The beam start, end, and intermediate equations are assembled using the present normalized transfer matrix (NTM). The advantage of this method is that it is quicker than the standard method becaus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anyway, this method's application is limited to multi-span [11] or multi-stepped beams [12] and can, therefore, not be applied on plane frame structures. Also, this method has been extended to crack identification of stepped beams with multiple edge cracks and different boundary conditions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, this method's application is limited to multi-span [11] or multi-stepped beams [12] and can, therefore, not be applied on plane frame structures. Also, this method has been extended to crack identification of stepped beams with multiple edge cracks and different boundary conditions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then these equations are assembled. There are several methods to assemble the segments equations but the most common methods are numerical assembly technique (NAT) [30,31], transfer matrix method (TMM) [32,33] and DSM [34][35][36]. In the current manuscript, DSM method is adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu and Chen (2000) developed an analytical and numerical–combined method (ANCM) to determine the natural frequencies of a uniform clamped–free beam with several inspan 1-DOF spring–mass–damper subsystems. For more complicated problems such as multi-span beams and beams that carry higher-order discrete subsystems, the frequency equation is obtained by solving the boundary conditions for each span and then applying one of the assembly methods such as the numerical assembly technique (El-Sayed and Farghaly, 2016a), dynamic stiffness matrix (Elsawaf et al, 2020), or transfer matrix method (TMM) (El-Sayed and Farghaly, 2017). El-Sayed and Farghaly (2016b) studied the free vibration of a single-span and multi-span Timoshenko beams, each mounted on a lumped parameter subsystem located at its ends and represented by a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) spring–mass system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%