1972
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(72)85082-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note of the plunging liquid jet reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, mean residence times are plotted against water jet velocities. The experimental conditions are as given below: (A) the nozzle inside diameter D= 3.02 x 10~3m, the waterjet length £,.=0.06m and the angle between the water jet discharge and the bath surface a=30°, and(B)D=5J5 x 10~3m, Lj=0.06m…”
Section: Vol 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, mean residence times are plotted against water jet velocities. The experimental conditions are as given below: (A) the nozzle inside diameter D= 3.02 x 10~3m, the waterjet length £,.=0.06m and the angle between the water jet discharge and the bath surface a=30°, and(B)D=5J5 x 10~3m, Lj=0.06m…”
Section: Vol 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies were on gas entrainment mechanisms [Bin 1985; Burgess et al 1972; Kumagai et al 1983 al. 1975].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important factors that cannot be overlooked are differences in the nozzle design (McCarthy andMolloy, 1974: Davis andMakepeace, 1978;Van de Donk, 1981) and the nozzle length, L, (Henderson et al, 1970;Cumming, 1975: Funatsu et al, 1988bBin, 1988). They are: nozzle diameter, nozzle velocity, nozzle height and nozzle inclination angle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%