2017
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2017.17.2543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on cobordisms of algebraic knots

Abstract: In this note we use Heegaard Floer homology to study smooth cobordisms of algebraic knots and complex deformations of cusp singularities of curves. The main tool will be the concordance invariant ν + : we study its behaviour with respect to connected sums, providing an explicit formula in the case of L-space knots and proving subadditivity in general.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we note that Theorem 1.1 gives an inequality for J#(−K) rather than J and K. However, by subadditivity of ν + [1], we also have the following result for J and K. Theorem 1.2. Suppose that K is deformed into J by a positive full-twist with n-linking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Here we note that Theorem 1.1 gives an inequality for J#(−K) rather than J and K. However, by subadditivity of ν + [1], we also have the following result for J and K. Theorem 1.2. Suppose that K is deformed into J by a positive full-twist with n-linking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, consider the chain maps v ′ s : C{i = 0} → C{min(i, j − s) = 0}, v + ′ s : C{i ≥ 0} → C{min(i, j − s) ≥ 0}, consisting of quotienting by C{i = 0, j ≤ s} followed by the inclusion. Ozsváth and Szabó [11] show that these maps induce the maps from (1) and (2).…”
Section: Definition 23 ([7]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…defined by taking the quotient by C{i < 0, j = s}, respectively C{i < 0, j ≥ s}, followed by the inclusions. The large integer surgery formula of Ozsváth-Szabó [11] asserts that the maps v s and v + s induce the maps from (1) and (2). Similarly, consider the chain maps v ′ s : C{i = 0} → C{min(i, j − s) = 0}, v + ′ s : C{i ≥ 0} → C{min(i, j − s) ≥ 0}, consisting of quotienting by C{i = 0, j ≤ s} followed by the inclusion.…”
Section: Definition 23 ([7]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trotter's classical knot signature [Tro62] and the Tristram-Levine signatures [Tri69,Lev69] allow to determine the cobordism distance of most torus knots of two fixed braid indices up to a constant [Baa12]. The modern Heegaard Floer concordance invariants ν + [HW16] and Υ [OSS17] lead to better bounds on cobordism distance depending on the braid indices [BCG17,FK17]. And for small braid indices, these invariants allow to compute the cobordism distance completely [Fel16,BFLZ16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%