2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2021)187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on commutation relation in conformal field theory

Abstract: In this note, we explicitly compute the vacuum expectation value of the commutator of scalar fields in a d-dimensional conformal field theory on the cylinder. We find from explicit calculations that we need smearing not only in space but also in time to have finite commutators except for those of free scalar operators. Thus the equal time commutators of the scalar fields are not well-defined for a non-free conformal field theory, even if which is defined from the Lagrangian. We also have the commutator for a c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the commutator of the operators is not well-defined for a non-free CFT, so we need to consider the commutator of the smeared operators for time and space directions. This formulation has been constructed [NT21,BDBM20] but has yet to apply it to the conformal bootstrap equations fully. It is a desirable research direction.…”
Section: Future Research Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the commutator of the operators is not well-defined for a non-free CFT, so we need to consider the commutator of the smeared operators for time and space directions. This formulation has been constructed [NT21,BDBM20] but has yet to apply it to the conformal bootstrap equations fully. It is a desirable research direction.…”
Section: Future Research Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we have neglected the terms which are sub-leading in 1/(p v a) expansion. 8 For ∆ / ∈ Z, there is a branching point v 1 = v 2 . Here, we can neglect the contribution around the branching point because 1 > ∆ − q.…”
Section: =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the paper, we have tried to present explicit formulas and also to emphasize ambiguities and open problems. See [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] for some recent papers that are on the topic of bulk reconstruction.…”
Section: Jhep12(2022)075mentioning
confidence: 99%