2012
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2010.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Diagnosability of Large Fault Sets on Star Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current paper, with Lemmas 3.9-3.11, we have shown that Property 7 holds just for . Recently, Chen and Liu [5] found counterexamples to Property 7: First, they selected a 3-dimensional substar graph, say , of Star Graph . In fact, is exactly a cycle of length 6.…”
Section: -Diagnosability Of Star Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the current paper, with Lemmas 3.9-3.11, we have shown that Property 7 holds just for . Recently, Chen and Liu [5] found counterexamples to Property 7: First, they selected a 3-dimensional substar graph, say , of Star Graph . In fact, is exactly a cycle of length 6.…”
Section: -Diagnosability Of Star Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, < a contradiction. However, [5] provided the counterexamples to Property 7 without further examining the cause that led to the flawed result. In the rest of this section, we pinpoint the missteps in the proof of Property 7 [26].…”
Section: -Diagnosability Of Star Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations