2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on explicit versus implicit information for job recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multistakeholder recommendation is an extension of recent efforts to expand the considerations involved in RS evaluation beyond simple accuracy measurements. Prior research has examined specific cases of such concerns in the category of reciprocal recommendations, such as applications in online dating [12], recruitment [13], education [14], advertising [15], and scientific collaboration [16].…”
Section: A Multistakeholder Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multistakeholder recommendation is an extension of recent efforts to expand the considerations involved in RS evaluation beyond simple accuracy measurements. Prior research has examined specific cases of such concerns in the category of reciprocal recommendations, such as applications in online dating [12], recruitment [13], education [14], advertising [15], and scientific collaboration [16].…”
Section: A Multistakeholder Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, we calculate the degree of the providers of the recommended items. The provider coverage is defined as follows: (13) where Nprovider is the number of different providers that can be recommended by this system and Ntotal is the total number of providers in the whole system.…”
Section: Many-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al [22] set the proportion of each activity to its score range to generate a personalized score in a functional form; this is not the best scheme using CF based on the common ground ratings. According to [23], using implicit feedback data resulted in a more diverse and accurate recommendation by providing a wealth of unbiased information compared to using explicit ratings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the data is not a result from recommendation. For the purpose of performance comparison, we therefore count the number of items purchased based on the assumption that top-N recommended items were presented to users [23,[38][39][40]. At each N, the recall by a user is computed as follows:…”
Section: Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recommender system is a software tool that recommends suitable items to a user or group of users [9]. The recommender systems infer user interests by utilizing various sources of data, such as user profiles, clicks, and feedbacks (rating, and like/dislike) [8,10]. However, in a smart TV environment, such data are neither accurate nor simple to predict or calculate because the smart TV represents a set of users with diverse interests and taste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%