2020
DOI: 10.4171/rlm/877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on metric-measure spaces supporting Poincaré inequalities

Abstract: Dedicated to Professor Vladimir Maz'ya on the occasion of his 80th birthday.Abstract. Using a method of Korobenko, Maldonado and Rios we show a new characterization of doubling metric-measure spaces supporting Poincaré inequalities without assuming a priori that the measure is doubling.Non-smooth functions have played a key role in analysis since the nineteenth century. One fundamental development in this vein came with the introduction of Sobolev spaces, which turned out to be a key tool in studying nonlinear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this note, we prove the same result but without assuming the doubling condition, as conjectured in [3] and the proof of the same is inspired by [2] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In this note, we prove the same result but without assuming the doubling condition, as conjectured in [3] and the proof of the same is inspired by [2] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…If q > p then the (q, p)-Poincaré inequality implies that µ is doubling, by Theorem 1 in Alvarado-Haj lasz [1]. Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 3.1 (and the fact that only connected spaces can support Poincaré inequalities) therefore give the following characterization of the (q, p)-Poincaré inequality, without presupposing that µ is doubling.…”
Section: Bow-ties In Metric Spacesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let B = B(x 0 , r) be an arbitrary ball. If r ≤1 2 |x 0 |, then since w is approximately decreasing we get thatB w(x) dx w(|x 0 | − r) ≃ w(|x 0 | + r) ≃ ess inf B w.On the other hand, if r > 1 2 |x 0 |, then B ⊂ B 3r . Hence using Lemma 7.1 we get that α+n−1 φ(ρ) β dρ ≃ r α φ(3r) β .Moreover, ess infB w ≥ ess inf B3r w ≃ w(3r) ≃ r α φ(3r) β ,which shows that the A 1 -condition is satisfied for all balls.Using Proposition 7.2 we obtain the following result which is well known when β = 0, see Heinonen-Kilpeläinen-Martio[21, p. 10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Very recently, it was also shown in [5] that a measure on R is locally p-admissible if and only if it is given by a local Ap-weight. Moreover, on R n , p-admissible measures can be characterized by a stronger version of the Poincaré inequality, the (q, p)-Poincaré inequality with q > p. Under doubling, the ( , p)-Poincaré inequality improves to a (q, p)-Poincaré inequality with q > p by [10] and any measure satisfying (q, p)-Poincaré inequality with q > p is a doubling measure, see [1] and [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following example from[1, Example 4] or[4, Example 6.2] gives a -regular tree with a nondoubling measure which satis es (4.10) for any < c < . Let X = (R+, dx, µ dµ) with µ(x) = min{ , x − }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%