2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0017089504001703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Nilpotent-by-Ernikov Groups

Abstract: Abstract. In this note we prove that a locally graded group G in which all proper subgroups are (nilpotent of class not exceeding n)-by-Černikov, is itself (nilpotent of class not exceeding n)-by-Černikov.As a preparatory result that is used for the proof of the former statement in the case of a periodic group, we also prove that a group G, containing a nilpotent of class n subgroup of finite index, also contains a characteristic subgroup of finite index that is nilpotent of class not exceeding n.2000 Mathemat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By a result of B. Bruno and F. Napolitani [1,Lemma 3] if a group has a subgroup of finite index k that is nilpotent of class l, then it also has a characteristic subgroup of finite (k, l)-bounded index that is nilpotent of class l. Therefore in the proof of Theorem 1.1 we only need a subgroup of (m, n, c)-bounded index and of (c, q)-bounded nilpotency class.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By a result of B. Bruno and F. Napolitani [1,Lemma 3] if a group has a subgroup of finite index k that is nilpotent of class l, then it also has a characteristic subgroup of finite (k, l)-bounded index that is nilpotent of class l. Therefore in the proof of Theorem 1.1 we only need a subgroup of (m, n, c)-bounded index and of (c, q)-bounded nilpotency class.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We shall denote by N n C the class of groups under discussion (and by NC the class of nilpotent-by-Chernikov groups). Using this result from [2], our final theorem is a very easy consequence of Theorem 3.…”
Section: Theorem 3 Let G Be a Locally Graded Group That Is Not Nilpomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Suppose that G satisfies the hypotheses but not the conclusion of Theorem 4. By Theorem 3, G is nilpotent-by-Chernikov; in particular G is L(NF), and another application of Lemma 3.2 of [4], using the main result of [2] in place of Theorem 1 above, gives the desired contradiction.…”
Section: Lemma Let G Be a Locally Graded Group With Finitely Many Comentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations